Xeon Platinum 8368 vs D-1518

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon D-1518
2015
4 cores / 8 threads, 35 Watt
3.14
Xeon Platinum 8368
2021
38 cores / 76 threads, 270 Watt
59.52
+1796%

Platinum 8368 outperforms D-1518 by a whopping 1796% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon D-1518 and Xeon Platinum 8368 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking153715
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.421.29
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesIntel Xeon Dno data
Architecture codenameBroadwell (2015−2019)Ice Lake-SP (2021)
Release date9 March 2015 (9 years ago)6 April 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$193no data
Current price$566 (2.9x MSRP)$12855

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon Platinum 8368 has 207% better value for money than Xeon D-1518.

Detailed specifications

Xeon D-1518 and Xeon Platinum 8368 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)38
Threads876
Base clock speed2.2 GHz2.4 GHz
Boost clock speed2.2 GHz3.4 GHz
L1 cache64K (per core)64K (per core)
L2 cache256K (per core)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache1.5 MB (per core)57 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm10 nm
Die size246.24 mm2no data
Maximum core temperatureno data84 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)80 °C83 °C
Number of transistors3,200 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Xeon D-1518 and Xeon Platinum 8368 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration12
SocketFCBGA1667FCLGA4189
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt270 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon D-1518 and Xeon Platinum 8368. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVX2Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
AVX++
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technology-2.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSX++
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+no data
GPIO+no data
StatusLaunchedLaunched

Security technologies

Xeon D-1518 and Xeon Platinum 8368 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++
Secure Key+no data
SGXno dataYes with Intel® SPS
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon D-1518 and Xeon Platinum 8368 are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon D-1518 and Xeon Platinum 8368. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4, DDR3DDR4-3200
Maximum memory size128 GB6 TB
Max memory channels28
Maximum memory bandwidth34.124 GB/sno data
ECC memory support++

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon D-1518 and Xeon Platinum 8368.

PCIe version2.0/3.04.0
PCI Express lanes3264
USB revision2.0/3.0no data
Total number of SATA ports6no data
Number of USB ports8no data
Integrated LAN+no data
UART+no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon D-1518 3.14
Xeon Platinum 8368 59.52
+1796%

Platinum 8368 outperforms D-1518 by 1796% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Xeon D-1518 4854
Xeon Platinum 8368 92054
+1796%

Platinum 8368 outperforms D-1518 by 1796% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 3.14 59.52
Recency 9 March 2015 6 April 2021
Physical cores 4 38
Threads 8 76
Chip lithography 14 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 270 Watt

The Xeon Platinum 8368 is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon D-1518 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon D-1518 and Xeon Platinum 8368, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon D-1518
Xeon D-1518
Intel Xeon Platinum 8368
Xeon Platinum 8368

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Xeon D-1518 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 88 votes

Rate Xeon Platinum 8368 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon D-1518 or Xeon Platinum 8368, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.