Xeon Platinum 8352Y vs D-1531

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregated performance score

Xeon D-1531
2015
6 cores / 12 threads
4.84
Xeon Platinum 8352Y
2021
32 cores / 64 threads
44.38
+817%

Platinum 8352Y outperforms D-1531 by 817% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Primary Details

Comparing Xeon D-1531 and Xeon Platinum 8352Y processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking115941
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation0.2513.83
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesIntel Xeon Dno data
Architecture codenameBroadwell (2015−2019)no data
Release date1 November 2015 (8 years ago)1 April 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$348no data
Current price$2360 (6.8x MSRP)$4822

Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon Platinum 8352Y has 5432% better value for money than Xeon D-1531.

Detailed Specifications

Xeon D-1531 and Xeon Platinum 8352Y basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores6 (Hexa-Core)32 (Dotriaconta-Core)
Threads1264
Base clock speed2.2 GHz2.2 GHz
Boost clock speed2.7 GHz3.4 GHz
L1 cache64K (per core)no data
L2 cache256K (per core)no data
L3 cache1.5 MB (per core)48 MB
Chip lithography14 nm10 nm
Die size246.24 mm2no data
Maximum core temperatureno data81 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)80 °Cno data
Number of transistors3,200 millionno data
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Xeon D-1531 and Xeon Platinum 8352Y compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketFCBGA1667FCLGA4189
Power consumption (TDP)45 Watt205 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon D-1531 and Xeon Platinum 8352Y. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVX2Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
AVX+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technology2.02.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSX++
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+no data
GPIO+no data
StatusLaunchedLaunched

Security technologies

Xeon D-1531 and Xeon Platinum 8352Y technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++
Secure Key+no data
SGXno dataYes with Intel® SPS
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon D-1531 and Xeon Platinum 8352Y are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon D-1531 and Xeon Platinum 8352Y. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4, DDR3DDR4-3200
Maximum memory size128 GB6 TB
Max memory channels28
Maximum memory bandwidth34.124 GB/sno data
ECC memory support++

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon D-1531 and Xeon Platinum 8352Y.

PCIe version2.0/3.04.0
PCI Express lanes3264
USB revision2.0/3.0no data
Total number of SATA ports6no data
Number of USB ports8no data
Integrated LAN+no data
UART+no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon D-1531 4.84
Xeon Platinum 8352Y 44.38
+817%

Platinum 8352Y outperforms D-1531 by 817% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Xeon D-1531 7483
Xeon Platinum 8352Y 68643
+817%

Platinum 8352Y outperforms D-1531 by 817% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Pros & Cons Summary


Performance score 4.84 44.38
Recency 1 November 2015 1 April 2021
Physical cores 6 32
Threads 12 64
Chip lithography 14 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 45 Watt 205 Watt

The Xeon Platinum 8352Y is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon D-1531 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon D-1531 and Xeon Platinum 8352Y, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for Your Favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon D-1531
Xeon D-1531
Intel Xeon Platinum 8352Y
Xeon Platinum 8352Y

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community Ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


1.3 4 votes

Rate Xeon D-1531 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 4 votes

Rate Xeon Platinum 8352Y on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & Сomments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon D-1531 or Xeon Platinum 8352Y, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.