Xeon Platinum 8160 vs 5160

VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon 5160
2006
2 cores / 2 threads, 80 Watt
0.63
Xeon Platinum 8160
2017
24 cores / 48 threads, 150 Watt
18.84
+2890%

Xeon Platinum 8160 outperforms Xeon 5160 by a whopping 2890% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon 5160 and Xeon Platinum 8160 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2782329
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation2.153.63
Market segmentServerServer
Seriesno dataIntel Xeon Platinum
Power efficiency0.7211.45
Architecture codenameWoodcrest (2006)Skylake (server) (2017−2019)
Release dateJune 2006 (18 years ago)25 April 2017 (7 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$22$4,702

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon Platinum 8160 has 69% better value for money than Xeon 5160.

Detailed specifications

Xeon 5160 and Xeon Platinum 8160 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)24 (Tetracosa-Core)
Threads248
Base clock speed3 GHz2.1 GHz
Boost clock speed3 GHz3.7 GHz
Multiplierno data21
L1 cache0 KB1.5 MB
L2 cache4 MB24 MB
L3 cache0 KB33 MB
Chip lithography65 nm14 nm
Maximum core temperature65 °C85 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
VID voltage rangeB2=1.0V-1.5V, G0=.85V-1.5Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Xeon 5160 and Xeon Platinum 8160 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration18 (Multiprocessor)
SocketLGA771FCLGA3647
Power consumption (TDP)80 Watt150 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon 5160 and Xeon Platinum 8160. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technology-2.0
Hyper-Threading Technology-+
TSX-+
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Demand Based Switching-no data
PAE32 Bitno data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data-
FSB parity+no data

Security technologies

Xeon 5160 and Xeon Platinum 8160 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-+
EDB++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon 5160 and Xeon Platinum 8160 are enumerated here.

VT-dno data+
VT-x++
EPT-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon 5160 and Xeon Platinum 8160. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR2DDR4-2666
Maximum memory sizeno data768 GB
Max memory channelsno data6
Maximum memory bandwidthno data128.001 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon 5160 and Xeon Platinum 8160.

PCIe versionno data3.0
PCI Express lanesno data48

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon 5160 0.63
Xeon Platinum 8160 18.84
+2890%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon 5160 963
Xeon Platinum 8160 28825
+2893%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.63 18.84
Physical cores 2 24
Threads 2 48
Chip lithography 65 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 80 Watt 150 Watt

Xeon 5160 has 87.5% lower power consumption.

Xeon Platinum 8160, on the other hand, has a 2890.5% higher aggregate performance score, 1100% more physical cores and 2300% more threads, and a 364.3% more advanced lithography process.

The Xeon Platinum 8160 is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon 5160 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon 5160 and Xeon Platinum 8160, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon 5160
Xeon 5160
Intel Xeon Platinum 8160
Xeon Platinum 8160

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 8 votes

Rate Xeon 5160 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.9 37 votes

Rate Xeon Platinum 8160 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon 5160 or Xeon Platinum 8160, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.