Celeron N2807 vs Xeon 5140
Primary details
Comparing Xeon 5140 and Celeron N2807 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in performance ranking | 2766 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 4.27 | no data |
| Market segment | Server | Laptop |
| Series | no data | Intel Celeron |
| Architecture codename | Woodcrest (2006) | Bay Trail-M (2013−2014) |
| Release date | June 2006 (18 years ago) | 23 February 2014 (10 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $15 | $107 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
Xeon 5140 and Celeron N2807 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Threads | 2 | 2 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 1.58 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2.33 GHz | 2.16 GHz |
| L1 cache | 0 KB | 112 KB |
| L2 cache | 4 MB | 1 MB |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | 0 KB |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 22 nm |
| Maximum core temperature | 65 °C | 105 °C |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
| Unlocked multiplier | No | No |
Compatibility
Information on Xeon 5140 and Celeron N2807 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | 771 | FCBGA1170 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 4.3 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon 5140 and Celeron N2807. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon 5140 and Celeron N2807. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR2 | DDR3 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | Intel HD Graphics |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon 5140 and Celeron N2807.
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 4 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Benchmark coverage: 65%
Xeon 5140 outperforms Celeron N2807 by 75% in Passmark.
Pros & cons summary
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 22 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 4 Watt |
Celeron N2807 has a 195.5% more advanced lithography process, and 1525% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Xeon 5140 and Celeron N2807. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Xeon 5140 is a server/workstation processor while Celeron N2807 is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon 5140 and Celeron N2807, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
