Core i7-1360P vs VIA Nano U2250
Primary details
Comparing VIA Nano U2250 and Core i7-1360P processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in performance ranking | not rated | 574 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | VIA Nano | Intel Raptor Lake-P |
| Architecture codename | Isaiah (2009) | Raptor Lake-P |
| Release date | 1 January 2009 (15 years ago) | 4 January 2023 (1 year ago) |
Detailed specifications
VIA Nano U2250 and Core i7-1360P basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 12 (Dodeca-Core) |
| Threads | 1 | 16 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 2.2 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1.5 GHz | 5 GHz |
| Bus support | 800 MHz | no data |
| L1 cache | no data | 80K (per core) |
| L2 cache | 1 MB | 2 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | no data | 18 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | Intel 7 nm |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 100 °C |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | + |
| Unlocked multiplier | No | No |
Compatibility
Information on VIA Nano U2250 and Core i7-1360P compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 |
| Socket | NanoBGA2 | FCBGA1744 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 10 Watt | 28 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by VIA Nano U2250 and Core i7-1360P. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2 |
| AES-NI | no data | + |
| FMA | no data | + |
| AVX | no data | + |
| vPro | no data | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
| Speed Shift | no data | + |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | no data | + |
| TSX | no data | + |
| Thermal Monitoring | no data | + |
| Flex Memory Access | no data | + |
| Status | no data | Launched |
Security technologies
VIA Nano U2250 and Core i7-1360P technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | + |
| EDB | no data | + |
| Secure Key | no data | + |
| OS Guard | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by VIA Nano U2250 and Core i7-1360P are enumerated here.
| VT-d | no data | + |
| VT-x | no data | + |
| EPT | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by VIA Nano U2250 and Core i7-1360P. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR4, DDR5 |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 96 GB |
| Max memory channels | no data | 2 |
| ECC memory support | no data | - |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | Intel® Iris® Xe Graphics eligible |
| Quick Sync Video | no data | + |
| Graphics max frequency | no data | 1.5 GHz |
| Execution Units | no data | 96 |
Graphics interfaces
Available interfaces and connections of VIA Nano U2250 and Core i7-1360P integrated GPUs.
| Number of displays supported | no data | 4 |
Graphics image quality
Maximum display resolutions supported by VIA Nano U2250 and Core i7-1360P integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.
| Max resolution over HDMI 1.4 | no data | 4096 x 2304 @ 60Hz |
| Max resolution over eDP | no data | 4096 x 2304 @ 120Hz |
| Max resolution over DisplayPort | no data | 7680 x 4320 @ 60Hz |
Graphics API support
APIs supported by VIA Nano U2250 and Core i7-1360P integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.
| DirectX | no data | 12.1 |
| OpenGL | no data | 4.6 |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by VIA Nano U2250 and Core i7-1360P.
| PCIe version | no data | 4.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 20 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Benchmark coverage: 68%
Core i7-1360P outperforms VIA Nano U2250 by 10709% in Passmark.
Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core
Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.
Benchmark coverage: 20%
Core i7-1360P outperforms VIA Nano U2250 by 1079% in Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core.
wPrime 32
wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.
Benchmark coverage: 18%
VIA Nano U2250 outperforms Core i7-1360P by 4373% in wPrime 32.
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 1 January 2009 | 4 January 2023 |
| Physical cores | 1 | 12 |
| Threads | 1 | 16 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 10 Watt | 28 Watt |
We couldn't decide between VIA Nano U2250 and Core i7-1360P. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between VIA Nano U2250 and Core i7-1360P, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
