VIA C7-M C7-M-1200 vs VIA Nano U2250
Primary details
Comparing VIA Nano U2250 and VIA C7-M C7-M-1200 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in performance ranking | not rated | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | VIA Nano | C7-M |
| Architecture codename | Isaiah (2009) | Esther |
| Release date | 1 January 2009 (15 years ago) | no data |
| Current price | no data | $244 |
Detailed specifications
VIA Nano U2250 and VIA C7-M C7-M-1200 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
| Threads | 1 | 1 |
| Boost clock speed | 1.5 GHz | 1.2 GHz |
| Bus support | 800 MHz | 400 MHz |
| L2 cache | 1 MB | no data |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 90 nm |
| 64 bit support | + | - |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
| Unlocked multiplier | No | No |
Compatibility
Information on VIA Nano U2250 and VIA C7-M C7-M-1200 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Socket | NanoBGA2 | no data |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 10 Watt | 5 Watt |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core
Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.
Benchmark coverage: 20%
VIA Nano U2250 outperforms VIA C7-M C7-M-1200 by 176% in Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core.
wPrime 32
wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.
Benchmark coverage: 18%
VIA C7-M C7-M-1200 outperforms VIA Nano U2250 by 41% in wPrime 32.
Pros & cons summary
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 90 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 10 Watt | 5 Watt |
We couldn't decide between VIA Nano U2250 and VIA C7-M C7-M-1200. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between VIA Nano U2250 and VIA C7-M C7-M-1200, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
