Xeon E-2314 vs Turion X2 Ultra ZM-80

VS

Aggregate performance score

Turion X2 Ultra ZM-80
2008
2 cores / 2 threads, 32 Watt
0.47
Xeon E-2314
2021
4 cores / 4 threads, 65 Watt
5.13
+991%

Xeon E-2314 outperforms Turion X2 Ultra ZM-80 by a whopping 991% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Turion X2 Ultra ZM-80 and Xeon E-2314 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking29081199
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopServer
Series2x AMD Turion Ultrano data
Power efficiency1.397.47
Architecture codenamePuma (2008−2009)Rocket Lake-E (2021)
Release date3 June 2008 (16 years ago)8 September 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Turion X2 Ultra ZM-80 and Xeon E-2314 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads24
Base clock speedno data2.8 GHz
Boost clock speed2.1 GHz4.5 GHz
Bus rate3600 MHz8 GT/s
L1 cache256 KB64K (per core)
L2 cache2 MB512K (per core)
L3 cache0 KB8 MB (shared)
Chip lithography65 nm14 nm
Maximum core temperatureno data100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data72 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Turion X2 Ultra ZM-80 and Xeon E-2314 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketS1g2FCLGA1200
Power consumption (TDP)32 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Turion X2 Ultra ZM-80 and Xeon E-2314. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, Enhanced 3DNow!, NX bit, AMD64, PowerNow!, AMD VirtualizationIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
PowerNow+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data-
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+

Security technologies

Turion X2 Ultra ZM-80 and Xeon E-2314 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+
Secure Keyno data+
MPX-+
SGXno dataYes with Intel® SPS
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Turion X2 Ultra ZM-80 and Xeon E-2314 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Turion X2 Ultra ZM-80 and Xeon E-2314. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR2DDR4-3200
Maximum memory sizeno data128 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
ECC memory support-+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Turion X2 Ultra ZM-80 and Xeon E-2314.

PCIe versionno data4.0
PCI Express lanesno data44

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.47 5.13
Recency 3 June 2008 8 September 2021
Physical cores 2 4
Threads 2 4
Chip lithography 65 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 32 Watt 65 Watt

Turion X2 Ultra ZM-80 has 103.1% lower power consumption.

Xeon E-2314, on the other hand, has a 991.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 13 years, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and a 364.3% more advanced lithography process.

The Xeon E-2314 is our recommended choice as it beats the Turion X2 Ultra ZM-80 in performance tests.

Be aware that Turion X2 Ultra ZM-80 is a notebook processor while Xeon E-2314 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Turion X2 Ultra ZM-80 and Xeon E-2314, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Turion X2 Ultra ZM-80
Turion X2 Ultra ZM-80
Intel Xeon E-2314
Xeon E-2314

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 9 votes

Rate Turion X2 Ultra ZM-80 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 7 votes

Rate Xeon E-2314 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Turion X2 Ultra ZM-80 or Xeon E-2314, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.