i9-11900F vs Turion X2 RM-75

Aggregate performance score

Turion X2 RM-75
2009
2 cores / 2 threads, 35 Watt
0.42
Core i9-11900F
2021
8 cores / 16 threads, 65 Watt
13.97
+3226%

Core i9-11900F outperforms Turion X2 RM-75 by a whopping 3226% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Turion X2 RM-75 and Core i9-11900F processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2969523
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
Series2x AMD Turionno data
Power efficiency1.1420.34
Architecture codenameLion (2008−2009)Rocket Lake (2021)
Release date1 January 2009 (15 years ago)16 March 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Turion X2 RM-75 and Core i9-11900F basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads216
Base clock speedno data2.5 GHz
Boost clock speed2.2 GHz5.1 GHz
Bus rate4000 MHz8 GT/s
L1 cache256 KB64K (per core)
L2 cache1 MB256K (per core)
L3 cache0 KB16 MB (shared)
Chip lithography65 nm14 nm
Maximum core temperatureno data100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data72 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Turion X2 RM-75 and Core i9-11900F compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketS1FCLGA1200
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Turion X2 RM-75 and Core i9-11900F. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, Enhanced 3DNow!, NX bit, AMD64, PowerNow!, AMD VirtualizationIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
PowerNow+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
TSX-+
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data+
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

Turion X2 RM-75 and Core i9-11900F technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+
Secure Keyno data+
Identity Protection-+
SGXno data-
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Turion X2 RM-75 and Core i9-11900F are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Turion X2 RM-75 and Core i9-11900F. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR4-3200
Maximum memory sizeno data128 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
Maximum memory bandwidthno data50 GB/s

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Turion X2 RM-75 and Core i9-11900F.

PCIe versionno data4.0
PCI Express lanesno data20

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Turion X2 RM-75 0.42
i9-11900F 13.97
+3226%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Turion X2 RM-75 670
i9-11900F 22197
+3213%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.42 13.97
Recency 1 January 2009 16 March 2021
Physical cores 2 8
Threads 2 16
Chip lithography 65 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 65 Watt

Turion X2 RM-75 has 85.7% lower power consumption.

i9-11900F, on the other hand, has a 3226.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 12 years, 300% more physical cores and 700% more threads, and a 364.3% more advanced lithography process.

The Core i9-11900F is our recommended choice as it beats the Turion X2 RM-75 in performance tests.

Be aware that Turion X2 RM-75 is a notebook processor while Core i9-11900F is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Turion X2 RM-75 and Core i9-11900F, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Turion X2 RM-75
Turion X2 RM-75
Intel Core i9-11900F
Core i9-11900F

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 6 votes

Rate Turion X2 RM-75 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 304 votes

Rate Core i9-11900F on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Turion X2 RM-75 or Core i9-11900F, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.