A4-3300M vs Turion X2 RM-70

VS

Primary details

Comparing Turion X2 RM-70 and A4-3300M processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot rated2649
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Series2x AMD TurionAMD A-Series
Power efficiencyno data2.01
Architecture codenamePuma (2008−2009)Llano (2011−2012)
Release date3 June 2008 (16 years ago)14 June 2011 (13 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Turion X2 RM-70 and A4-3300M basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Base clock speedno data1.9 GHz
Boost clock speed2 GHz2.5 GHz
Bus rate3600 MHzno data
L1 cache256 KB128 KB (per core)
L2 cache1 MB1 MB (per core)
L3 cache0 KB0 KB
Chip lithography65 nm32 nm
Die sizeno data228 mm2
Number of transistorsno data1,178 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Turion X2 RM-70 and A4-3300M compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketS1FS1
Power consumption (TDP)31 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Turion X2 RM-70 and A4-3300M. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, Enhanced 3DNow!, NX bit, AMD64, PowerNow!, AMD Virtualization3DNow!, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSE4a, Radeon HD 6480G
PowerNow+-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Turion X2 RM-70 and A4-3300M are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Turion X2 RM-70 and A4-3300M. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR3

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon HD 6480G

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Turion X2 RM-70 1556
A4-3300M 1742
+11.9%

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Turion X2 RM-70 3012
A4-3300M 3417
+13.4%

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Turion X2 RM-70 1412
A4-3300M 1556
+10.2%

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Turion X2 RM-70 44
A4-3300M 40.2
+9.5%

Pros & cons summary


Recency 3 June 2008 14 June 2011
Chip lithography 65 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 31 Watt 35 Watt

Turion X2 RM-70 has 12.9% lower power consumption.

A4-3300M, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 years, and a 103.1% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Turion X2 RM-70 and A4-3300M. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Turion X2 RM-70 and A4-3300M, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Turion X2 RM-70
Turion X2 RM-70
AMD A4-3300M
A4-3300M

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.5 51 vote

Rate Turion X2 RM-70 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 110 votes

Rate A4-3300M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Turion X2 RM-70 or A4-3300M, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.