Ryzen 7 5800X3D vs Turion II Ultra M660
Aggregate performance score
Ryzen 7 5800X3D outperforms Turion II Ultra M660 by a whopping 2628% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Turion II Ultra M660 and Ryzen 7 5800X3D processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in performance ranking | 2634 | 305 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | no data | 29.74 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop processor |
| Series | AMD Turion II Ultra | AMD Ryzen 7 |
| Architecture codename | Caspian (2009) | Vermeer (Zen3) (2020) |
| Release date | 10 September 2009 (14 years ago) | 20 April 2022 (2 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $449 |
| Current price | no data | $507 (1.1x MSRP) |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
Turion II Ultra M660 and Ryzen 7 5800X3D basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 8 (Octa-Core) |
| Threads | 2 | 16 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 3.4 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2.7 GHz | 4.5 GHz |
| Bus support | 3600 MHz | no data |
| L1 cache | no data | 64K (per core) |
| L2 cache | 2 MB | 512K (per core) |
| L3 cache | no data | 96 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 7 nm |
| Die size | no data | 74 + 125 mm |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 90 °C |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | no data | 90 °C |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | + |
| Unlocked multiplier | No | No |
Compatibility
Information on Turion II Ultra M660 and Ryzen 7 5800X3D compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 |
| Socket | Socket S1 (s1g3) 638-pin | AM4 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 105 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Turion II Ultra M660 and Ryzen 7 5800X3D. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | Dual-channel 400 MHz DDR2 memory controller, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, Enhanced 3DNow!, NX bit, AMD64, PowerNow!, AMD Virtualization | 86x MMX(+), SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A,-64, AMD-V, AES, AVX, AVX2, FMA3, SHA, Precision Boost 2 |
| AES-NI | no data | + |
| AVX | no data | + |
| PowerNow | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Turion II Ultra M660 and Ryzen 7 5800X3D are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Turion II Ultra M660 and Ryzen 7 5800X3D. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR2 | DDR4-3200 |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 128 GB |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Turion II Ultra M660 and Ryzen 7 5800X3D.
| PCIe version | no data | 4.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 20 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Ryzen 7 5800X3D outperforms Turion II Ultra M660 by 2628% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core
Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.
Benchmark coverage: 20%
Ryzen 7 5800X3D outperforms Turion II Ultra M660 by 164% in Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core.
Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core
Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.
Benchmark coverage: 19%
Ryzen 7 5800X3D outperforms Turion II Ultra M660 by 854% in Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.67 | 18.28 |
| Recency | 10 September 2009 | 20 April 2022 |
| Physical cores | 2 | 8 |
| Threads | 2 | 16 |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 7 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 105 Watt |
The Ryzen 7 5800X3D is our recommended choice as it beats the Turion II Ultra M660 in performance tests.
Be aware that Turion II Ultra M660 is a notebook processor while Ryzen 7 5800X3D is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Turion II Ultra M660 and Ryzen 7 5800X3D, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
