Athlon 750 vs Phenom II X4 P920

VS

Primary details

Comparing Phenom II X4 P920 and Athlon 750 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2579not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
Series4x AMD Phenom IIno data
Power efficiency3.22no data
Architecture codenameChamplain (2010−2011)Thunderbird (1999−2000)
Release date12 May 2010 (14 years ago)29 November 1999 (25 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$799

Detailed specifications

Phenom II X4 P920 and Athlon 750 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads41
Boost clock speed1.6 GHz0.75 GHz
Bus rate3600 MHzno data
L1 cache512 KB128 KB
L2 cache2 MB512 KB
L3 cacheno data0 KB
Chip lithography45 nm180 nm
Die sizeno data102 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data70 °C
Number of transistorsno data22 million
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Phenom II X4 P920 and Athlon 750 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketS1 (S1g4)A
Power consumption (TDP)25 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Phenom II X4 P920 and Athlon 750. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsMMX, 3DNow, SSE (1,2,3,4A), AMD64, Enhanced Virus Protection, Virtualization, HyperTransport 3.0no data
VirusProtect+-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Phenom II X4 P920 and Athlon 750 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Phenom II X4 P920 and Athlon 750. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR1

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataN/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 12 May 2010 29 November 1999
Physical cores 4 1
Threads 4 1
Chip lithography 45 nm 180 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 25 Watt 35 Watt

Phenom II X4 P920 has an age advantage of 10 years, 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads, a 300% more advanced lithography process, and 40% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Phenom II X4 P920 and Athlon 750. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Phenom II X4 P920 is a notebook processor while Athlon 750 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Phenom II X4 P920 and Athlon 750, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Phenom II X4 P920
Phenom II X4 P920
AMD Athlon 750
Athlon 750

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 35 votes

Rate Phenom II X4 P920 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1 2 votes

Rate Athlon 750 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Phenom II X4 P920 or Athlon 750, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.