Celeron Dual-Core T1600 vs Turion 64 X2 TL-60
Aggregate performance score
Celeron Dual-Core T1600 outperforms Turion 64 X2 TL-60 by a substantial 30% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Turion 64 X2 TL-60 and Celeron Dual-Core T1600 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 2933 | 2808 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | 2x AMD Turion 64 | Intel Celeron Dual-Core |
| Power efficiency | 1.24 | 1.62 |
| Architecture codename | Trinidad/Tyler (2007) | Merom (2006−2008) |
| Release date | 4 May 2007 (17 years ago) | 1 May 2008 (16 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Turion 64 X2 TL-60 and Celeron Dual-Core T1600 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Threads | 2 | 2 |
| Boost clock speed | 2 GHz | 1.66 GHz |
| Bus rate | 800 MHz | 667 MHz |
| L1 cache | 256 KB | no data |
| L2 cache | 1 MB | 1 MB |
| Chip lithography | 90 nm | 65 nm |
| Die size | 147 mm2 | 143 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 95 °C | 100 °C |
| Number of transistors | 154 Million | 291 Million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Turion 64 X2 TL-60 and Celeron Dual-Core T1600 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Socket | S1 | PPGA478 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35/31 Watt | 35 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Turion 64 X2 TL-60 and Celeron Dual-Core T1600. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | 90/65 nm, 1.075 | no data |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core
Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.
3DMark06 CPU
3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.46 | 0.60 |
| Recency | 4 May 2007 | 1 May 2008 |
| Chip lithography | 90 nm | 65 nm |
Celeron Dual-Core T1600 has a 30.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 11 months, and a 38.5% more advanced lithography process.
The Celeron Dual-Core T1600 is our recommended choice as it beats the Turion 64 X2 TL-60 in performance tests.
Should you still have questions on choice between Turion 64 X2 TL-60 and Celeron Dual-Core T1600, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
