E2-9000 vs Celeron Dual-Core T1600
Aggregated performance score
E2-9000 outperforms Celeron Dual-Core T1600 by 3% based on our aggregated benchmark results.
Primary Details
Comparing Celeron Dual-Core T1600 and E2-9000 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in performance ranking | 2650 | 2642 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | Intel Celeron Dual-Core | Bristol Ridge |
| Architecture codename | Merom (2006−2008) | Stoney Ridge (2016−2019) |
| Release date | 1 May 2008 (15 years ago) | 1 June 2016 (7 years ago) |
| Current price | $66 | $78 |
Detailed Specifications
Celeron Dual-Core T1600 and E2-9000 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Threads | 2 | 2 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 1.8 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1.66 GHz | 2.2 GHz |
| Bus support | 667 MHz | no data |
| L2 cache | 1 MB | 1 MB |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 28 nm |
| Die size | 143 mm2 | 124.5 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 90 °C |
| Number of transistors | 291 Million | 1200 Million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
| Unlocked multiplier | No | No |
Compatibility
Information on Celeron Dual-Core T1600 and E2-9000 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Socket | PPGA478 | BGA |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 10 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron Dual-Core T1600 and E2-9000. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | Single-Channel DDR4-1866, Virtualization, |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron Dual-Core T1600 and E2-9000 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron Dual-Core T1600 and E2-9000. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR4 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | AMD Radeon R2 (Stoney Ridge) |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
E2-9000 outperforms Celeron Dual-Core T1600 by 3% based on our aggregated benchmark results.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Benchmark coverage: 68%
E2-9000 outperforms Celeron Dual-Core T1600 by 2% in Passmark.
Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core
Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.
Benchmark coverage: 19%
Celeron Dual-Core T1600 outperforms E2-9000 by 4% in Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core.
3DMark06 CPU
3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.
Benchmark coverage: 19%
E2-9000 outperforms Celeron Dual-Core T1600 by 15% in 3DMark06 CPU.
Pros & Cons Summary
| Performance score | 0.60 | 0.62 |
| Recency | 1 May 2008 | 1 June 2016 |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 28 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 10 Watt |
Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Celeron Dual-Core T1600 and E2-9000.
Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron Dual-Core T1600 and E2-9000, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
