Celeron N2805 vs Turion 64 ML-37

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
Turion 64 ML-28 Turion 64 ML-30 Turion 64 ML-32 Turion 64 ML-34 Turion 64 ML-37 Turion 64 ML-40 Turion 64 ML-42 Turion 64 ML-44 Turion 64 MT-28 Turion 64 MT-30 Turion 64 MT-32 Turion 64 MT-34 Turion 64 MT-37 Turion 64 MT-40
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
Celeron N2830 Celeron N2840 Celeron N2930 Pentium N3530 Pentium N3540

Aggregate performance score

Turion 64 ML-37
2005
1 core / 1 thread, 35 Watt
0.21
Celeron N2805
2013
2 cores / 2 threads, 4 Watt
0.21

Contents

Turion 64 ML-37 Turion 64 ML-37
Celeron N2805 Celeron N2805

Primary details

Comparing Turion 64 ML-37 and Celeron N2805 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking32273216
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesTurion 64Intel Celeron
Power efficiency0.574.97
Architecture codenameLancaster (2005−2006)Bay Trail-M (2013−2014)
Release dateMarch 2005 (19 years ago)11 September 2013 (11 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$107

Detailed specifications

Turion 64 ML-37 and Celeron N2805 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads12
Base clock speedno data1.46 GHz
Boost clock speed2 GHz1.46 GHz
Bus rate800 MHzno data
L1 cache128 KB56K (per core)
L2 cache1 MB512K (per core)
L3 cache0 KB0 KB
Chip lithography90 nm22 nm
Die size125 mm2no data
Maximum core temperatureno data80 °C
Number of transistors114 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Turion 64 ML-37 and Celeron N2805 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
Socket754FCBGA1170
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt4.3 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Turion 64 ML-37 and Celeron N2805. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

PowerNow+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data-
Idle Statesno data+
Smart Connectno data+
RSTno data-

Security technologies

Turion 64 ML-37 and Celeron N2805 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

EDBno data+
Anti-Theftno data-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Turion 64 ML-37 and Celeron N2805 are enumerated here.

VT-dno data-
VT-xno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Turion 64 ML-37 and Celeron N2805. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR3
Maximum memory sizeno data4 GB
Max memory channelsno data1

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel HD Graphics for Intel Atom Processor Z3700 Series
Graphics max frequencyno data667 MHz

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Turion 64 ML-37 and Celeron N2805 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data2

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Turion 64 ML-37 and Celeron N2805.

PCIe versionno data2.0
PCI Express lanesno data4
USB revisionno data3.0 and 2.0
Total number of SATA portsno data2
Number of USB portsno data5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Turion 64 ML-37 0.21
Celeron N2805 0.21

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Turion 64 ML-37 805
Celeron N2805 885
+9.9%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary

Physical cores 1 2
Threads 1 2
Chip lithography 90 nm 22 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 4 Watt

Celeron N2805 has 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, a 309.1% more advanced lithography process, and 775% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Turion 64 ML-37 and Celeron N2805.

Should you still have questions on choice between Turion 64 ML-37 and Celeron N2805, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.

AMD Turion 64 ML-37
Turion 64 ML-37
Intel Celeron N2805
Celeron N2805
Like
Like

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Turion 64 ML-37 Turion 64 ML-37
vs
Turion 64 ML-44 Turion 64 ML-44
Celeron N2805 Celeron N2805
vs
E-300 E 300
Turion 64 ML-37 Turion 64 ML-37
vs
Zhaoxin KaiXian KX-6000G Zhaoxin KaiXian KX-6000G
Turion 64 X2 TL-62 Turion 64 X2 TL-62
vs
Celeron M 585 Celeron M 585
Pentium 4 560 Pentium 4 560
vs
Athlon 64 3000+ Athlon 64 3000+
Mobile Sempron M100 Mobile Sempron M100
vs
Duo T2250 Core Duo T2250
Turion 64 MK-38 Turion 64 MK-38
vs
Atom N2600 Atom N2600
Turion 64 MT-37 Turion 64 MT-37
vs
Celeron N2805 Celeron N2805
Solo T1400 Core Solo T1400
vs
GX-210JA GX 210JA
Celeron M 575 Celeron M 575
vs
Mobile Athlon 64 2700+ Mobile Athlon 64 2700+
V-Series V105 V Series V105
vs
Celeron M 450 Celeron M 450
Turion 64 ML-34 Turion 64 ML-34
vs
Pentium M 745 Pentium M 745
Turion 64 MK-36 Turion 64 MK-36
vs
Celeron N2805 Celeron N2805

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.

No user ratings yet.

Rate Turion 64 ML-37 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 101 vote

Rate Celeron N2805 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Turion 64 ML-37 or Celeron N2805, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.