Celeron M 450 vs V-Series V105
Aggregate performance score
Primary details
Comparing V-Series V105 and Celeron M 450 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 3322 | 3313 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | AMD V-Series | Celeron M |
| Power efficiency | 1.47 | 0.49 |
| Architecture codename | no data | Yonah (2005−2006) |
| Release date | 12 May 2010 (14 years ago) | no data (2024 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
V-Series V105 and Celeron M 450 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
| Threads | 1 | 1 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 2 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1.2 GHz | 2 GHz |
| Bus rate | 2000 MHz | 533 MHz |
| L1 cache | 128 KB | no data |
| L2 cache | 512 KB | no data |
| L3 cache | no data | 1 MB L2 KB |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 65 nm |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 100 °C |
| 64 bit support | + | - |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
| VID voltage range | no data | 1.0V-1.3V |
Compatibility
Information on V-Series V105 and Celeron M 450 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Socket | S1 | PPGA478 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 9 Watt | 27 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by V-Series V105 and Celeron M 450. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | SSE4A, AMD64, Enhanced Virus Protection, Virtualization | no data |
| VirusProtect | + | - |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | - |
| Turbo Boost Technology | no data | - |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | no data | - |
| Idle States | no data | - |
| Demand Based Switching | no data | - |
| PAE | no data | 32 Bit |
| FSB parity | no data | - |
Security technologies
V-Series V105 and Celeron M 450 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | - |
| EDB | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by V-Series V105 and Celeron M 450 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
| VT-x | no data | - |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by V-Series V105 and Celeron M 450. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3 | no data |
Pros & cons summary
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 65 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 9 Watt | 27 Watt |
V-Series V105 has a 44.4% more advanced lithography process, and 200% lower power consumption.
Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between V-Series V105 and Celeron M 450.
Should you still have questions on choice between V-Series V105 and Celeron M 450, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
