Celeron M 743 vs Turion 64 ML-34

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
Turion 64 ML-28 Turion 64 ML-30 Turion 64 ML-32 Turion 64 ML-34 Turion 64 ML-37 Turion 64 ML-40 Turion 64 ML-42 Turion 64 ML-44 Turion 64 MT-28 Turion 64 MT-30 Turion 64 MT-32 Turion 64 MT-34 Turion 64 MT-37 Turion 64 MT-40
VS
Core 2 Duo T6600 Core 2 Duo T9300 Pentium Dual Core T4300 Pentium Dual Core T4400 Pentium Dual Core T4500

Aggregate performance score

Turion 64 ML-34
2005
1 core / 1 thread, 35 Watt
0.18
+20%
Celeron M 743
2009
1 core / 1 thread, 10 Watt
0.15

Turion 64 ML-34 outperforms Celeron M 743 by a significant 20% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Turion 64 ML-34 Turion 64 ML-34
Celeron M 743 Celeron M 743

Primary details

Comparing Turion 64 ML-34 and Celeron M 743 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking32633320
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesTurion 64Intel Celeron M
Power efficiency0.491.42
Architecture codenameLancaster (2005−2006)Penryn (2008−2011)
Release date10 March 2005 (19 years ago)1 September 2009 (15 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$107

Detailed specifications

Turion 64 ML-34 and Celeron M 743 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads11
Boost clock speed1.8 GHz1.3 GHz
Bus rate800 MHz800 MHz
L1 cache128 KB64 KB
L2 cache1 MB1 MB
L3 cache0 KBno data
Chip lithography90 nm45 nm
Die size125 mm2107 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data100 °C
Number of transistors114 million410 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Turion 64 ML-34 and Celeron M 743 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
Socket754BGA965
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt10 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Turion 64 ML-34 and Celeron M 743. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

PowerNow+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Turion 64 ML-34 and Celeron M 743. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR1no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardOn certain motherboards (Chipset feature)no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Turion 64 ML-34 0.18
+20%
Celeron M 743 0.15

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Turion 64 ML-34 694
+19.3%
Celeron M 743 582

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 0.18 0.15
Recency 10 March 2005 1 September 2009
Chip lithography 90 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 10 Watt

Turion 64 ML-34 has a 20% higher aggregate performance score.

Celeron M 743, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 4 years, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 250% lower power consumption.

The Turion 64 ML-34 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron M 743 in performance tests.

Should you still have questions on choice between Turion 64 ML-34 and Celeron M 743, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.

AMD Turion 64 ML-34
Turion 64 ML-34
Intel Celeron M 743
Celeron M 743
Like
Like

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Turion 64 ML-34 Turion 64 ML-34
vs
Turion 64 MT-32 Turion 64 MT-32
Celeron M 743 Celeron M 743
vs
Athlon 64 TF-20 Athlon 64 TF-20
Turion 64 ML-34 Turion 64 ML-34
vs
Pentium M 740 Pentium M 740
Celeron M 743 Celeron M 743
vs
A8-3550MX A8 3550MX
Celeron M 743 Celeron M 743
vs
A6-3430MX A6 3430MX
A10-4655M A10 4655M
vs
Celeron M 743 Celeron M 743
Celeron M 743 Celeron M 743
vs
A6-5357M A6 5357M
E-450 E 450
vs
Celeron M 743 Celeron M 743
A10-9620P A10 9620P
vs
Celeron M 743 Celeron M 743
A9-9425 A9 9425
vs
Celeron M 743 Celeron M 743
A6-9225 A6 9225
vs
Celeron M 743 Celeron M 743
A4-3300 A4 3300
vs
Pentium 4 2.4 GHz Pentium 4 2.4 GHz
A4-3400 A4 3400
vs
Pentium 4 2.4 GHz Pentium 4 2.4 GHz

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.

5 1 vote

Rate Turion 64 ML-34 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 23 votes

Rate Celeron M 743 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Turion 64 ML-34 or Celeron M 743, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.