Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U vs Transmeta Crusoe TM-5800

VS

Primary details

Comparing Transmeta Crusoe TM-5800 and Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot rated447
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesTransmeta CrusoeAMD Phoenix (Zen 4, Ryzen 7040)
Power efficiencyno data52.28
Architecture codenameCrusoe (2001)Phoenix (Zen 4) (2023)
Release date1 June 2001 (23 years ago)3 May 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

Transmeta Crusoe TM-5800 and Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads116
Base clock speedno data3.3 GHz
Boost clock speed1 GHz5.1 GHz
Bus rate266 MHzno data
L1 cache128 KB512 KB
L2 cache512 KB8 MB
L3 cacheno data16 MB
Chip lithography130 nm4 nm
Die size55 mm2178 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data100 °C
Number of transistors36.8 Millionno data
64 bit support-+
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Transmeta Crusoe TM-5800 and Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

SocketCBGA-474no data
Power consumption (TDP)7 Watt28 Watt

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon 780M ( - 2700 MHz)

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 June 2001 3 May 2023
Physical cores 1 8
Threads 1 16
Chip lithography 130 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 7 Watt 28 Watt

Transmeta Crusoe TM-5800 has 300% lower power consumption.

Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 21 year, 700% more physical cores and 1500% more threads, and a 3150% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Transmeta Crusoe TM-5800 and Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Transmeta Crusoe TM-5800 and Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Transmeta Crusoe TM-5800
Crusoe TM-5800
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U
Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.9 93 votes

Rate Transmeta Crusoe TM-5800 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 49 votes

Rate Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Transmeta Crusoe TM-5800 or Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.