Transmeta Crusoe TM-5800 vs Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking510not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD Phoenix (Zen 4, Ryzen 7040)Transmeta Crusoe
Power efficiency18.49no data
DesignerAMDTransmeta
Architecture codenamePhoenix-HS (Zen 4) (2023)Crusoe (2001)
Release date13 June 2023 (2 years ago)1 June 2001 (24 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS and Transmeta Crusoe TM-5800 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads161
Base clock speed3.8 GHzno data
Boost clock speed5.1 GHz1 GHz
Bus rateno data266 MHz
L1 cache512 KB128 KB
L2 cache8 MB512 KB
L3 cache16 MBno data
Chip lithography4 nm130 nm
Die size178 mm255 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data36.8 Million
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibilityno data-

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS and Transmeta Crusoe TM-5800 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

SocketFP7/FP8CBGA-474
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt7 Watt

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon 780M ( - 2700 MHz)no data

Pros & cons summary


Recency 13 June 2023 1 June 2001
Physical cores 8 1
Threads 16 1
Chip lithography 4 nm 130 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 7 Watt

Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS has an age advantage of 22 years, 700% more physical cores and 1500% more threads, and a 3150% more advanced lithography process.

Transmeta Crusoe TM-5800, on the other hand, has 400% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS and Transmeta Crusoe TM-5800. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS
Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS
Transmeta Crusoe TM-5800
Crusoe TM-5800

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.6 66 votes

Rate Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.9 96 votes

Rate Transmeta Crusoe TM-5800 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS and Transmeta Crusoe TM-5800, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.