Apple M2 Pro 10-Core vs Sempron X2 2100
Primary details
Comparing Sempron X2 2100 and Apple M2 Pro 10-Core processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | 537 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Laptop |
| Series | no data | Apple M-Series |
| Architecture codename | Brisbane (2007−2008) | no data |
| Release date | March 2008 (16 years ago) | 17 January 2023 (1 year ago) |
Detailed specifications
Sempron X2 2100 and Apple M2 Pro 10-Core basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 10 (Deca-Core) |
| Threads | 2 | 10 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 2.424 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1.8 GHz | 3.7 GHz |
| L1 cache | 128 KB | 7.3 MB |
| L2 cache | 256 KB | 36 MB |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | 24 MB |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 5 nm |
| Die size | 118 mm2 | no data |
| Number of transistors | 221 million | 40000 Million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Sempron X2 2100 and Apple M2 Pro 10-Core compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 2 | no data |
| Socket | AM2 | no data |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 2424 ‑ 3696 Watt |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | Apple M2 Pro 16-Core GPU |
Pros & cons summary
| Physical cores | 2 | 10 |
| Threads | 2 | 10 |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 5 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 2424 Watt |
Sempron X2 2100 has 3629.2% lower power consumption.
Apple M2 Pro 10-Core, on the other hand, has 400% more physical cores and 400% more threads, and a 1200% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Sempron X2 2100 and Apple M2 Pro 10-Core. We've got no test results to judge.
Note that Sempron X2 2100 is a desktop processor while Apple M2 Pro 10-Core is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Sempron X2 2100 and Apple M2 Pro 10-Core, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
