Xeon Bronze 3508U vs Opteron 6276

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Opteron 6276
2011
16 cores / 16 threads, 115 Watt
3.60
Xeon Bronze 3508U
2023
8 cores / 8 threads, 125 Watt
6.36
+76.7%

Xeon Bronze 3508U outperforms Opteron 6276 by an impressive 77% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking16061166
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.65no data
Market segmentServerServer
Power efficiency1.332.16
DesignerAMDIntel
ManufacturerGlobalFoundriesno data
Architecture codenameInterlagos (2011−2012)no data
Release date14 November 2011 (13 years ago)1 October 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$119no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

Opteron 6276 and Xeon Bronze 3508U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores16 (Hexadeca-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads168
Base clock speed2.3 GHz2.1 GHz
Boost clock speed3.2 GHz2.2 GHz
L1 cache768 KBno data
L2 cache2 MB (per module)no data
L3 cache8 MB (per die)22.5 MB
Chip lithography32 nmIntel 7 nm
Die size2x 315 mm2no data
Maximum core temperatureno data83 °C
Number of transistors2,400 millionno data
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on Opteron 6276 and Xeon Bronze 3508U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration4no data
SocketG34FCLGA4677
Power consumption (TDP)115 Watt125 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Opteron 6276 and Xeon Bronze 3508U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® AMX, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
FMA+-
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
TSX-+
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

Opteron 6276 and Xeon Bronze 3508U technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+
SGXno dataYes with Intel® SPS
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Opteron 6276 and Xeon Bronze 3508U are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Opteron 6276 and Xeon Bronze 3508U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR5 @ 4400 MT/s (1 DPC &2DPC)
Maximum memory sizeno data4 TB
Max memory channelsno data8
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/Ano data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Opteron 6276 and Xeon Bronze 3508U.

PCIe version2.04
PCI Express lanesno data80

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

Opteron 6276 3.60
Xeon Bronze 3508U 6.36
+76.7%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

Opteron 6276 6348
Xeon Bronze 3508U 11224
+76.8%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 3.60 6.36
Recency 14 November 2011 1 October 2023
Physical cores 16 8
Threads 16 8
Power consumption (TDP) 115 Watt 125 Watt

Opteron 6276 has 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and 8.7% lower power consumption.

Xeon Bronze 3508U, on the other hand, has a 76.7% higher aggregate performance score, and an age advantage of 11 years.

The Intel Xeon Bronze 3508U is our recommended choice as it beats the AMD Opteron 6276 in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Opteron 6276
Opteron 6276
Intel Xeon Bronze 3508U
Xeon Bronze 3508U

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 52 votes

Rate Opteron 6276 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 2 votes

Rate Xeon Bronze 3508U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Opteron 6276 and Xeon Bronze 3508U, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.