Xeon Platinum 8380HL vs Sempron 3800+
Primary details
Comparing Sempron 3800+ and Xeon Platinum 8380HL processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in the ranking | not rated | not rated |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Market segment | Desktop processor | Server |
Architecture codename | Manila (2001−2006) | Cooper Lake-SP (2021) |
Release date | October 2006 (18 years ago) | 6 April 2021 (3 years ago) |
Launch price (MSRP) | $21 | no data |
Detailed specifications
Sempron 3800+ and Xeon Platinum 8380HL basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 28 (Octacosa-Core) |
Threads | 1 | 56 |
Base clock speed | no data | 2.9 GHz |
Boost clock speed | 2.2 GHz | 4.3 GHz |
L1 cache | 128 KB | 64K (per core) |
L2 cache | 256 KB | 1 MB (per core) |
L3 cache | 0 KB | 38.5 MB (shared) |
Chip lithography | 90 nm | 14 nm |
Die size | 103 mm2 | no data |
Number of transistors | 81 million | no data |
64 bit support | + | + |
Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Sempron 3800+ and Xeon Platinum 8380HL compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 8 |
Socket | AM2 | FCLGA4189 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 62 Watt | 250 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Sempron 3800+ and Xeon Platinum 8380HL. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
Instruction set extensions | no data | Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512 |
AES-NI | - | + |
AVX | - | + |
vPro | no data | + |
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
Speed Shift | no data | + |
Hyper-Threading Technology | no data | + |
TSX | - | + |
Deep Learning Boost | - | + |
Security technologies
Sempron 3800+ and Xeon Platinum 8380HL technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
TXT | no data | + |
EDB | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Sempron 3800+ and Xeon Platinum 8380HL are enumerated here.
VT-d | no data | + |
VT-x | no data | + |
EPT | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Sempron 3800+ and Xeon Platinum 8380HL. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | no data | DDR4 RDIMM |
Maximum memory size | no data | 4.5 TB |
Max memory channels | no data | 6 |
ECC memory support | - | + |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Sempron 3800+ and Xeon Platinum 8380HL.
PCIe version | no data | 3.0 |
PCI Express lanes | no data | 48 |
Pros & cons summary
Physical cores | 1 | 28 |
Threads | 1 | 56 |
Chip lithography | 90 nm | 14 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 62 Watt | 250 Watt |
Sempron 3800+ has 303.2% lower power consumption.
Xeon Platinum 8380HL, on the other hand, has 2700% more physical cores and 5500% more threads, and a 542.9% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Sempron 3800+ and Xeon Platinum 8380HL. We've got no test results to judge.
Note that Sempron 3800+ is a desktop processor while Xeon Platinum 8380HL is a server/workstation one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Sempron 3800+ and Xeon Platinum 8380HL, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.