Xeon w5-2465X vs Opteron 140 EE
Primary details
Comparing Opteron 140 EE and Xeon w5-2465X processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in performance ranking | not rated | 124 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | no data | 40.97 |
| Market segment | Server | Server |
| Architecture codename | SledgeHammer (2003−2004) | Sapphire Rapids |
| Release date | February 2004 (20 years ago) | 1 January 2023 (1 year ago) |
| Current price | no data | $1475 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
Opteron 140 EE and Xeon w5-2465X basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 16 (Hexadeca-Core) |
| Threads | 1 | 32 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 3.1 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1.4 GHz | 4.7 GHz |
| L1 cache | 128 KB | 80K (per core) |
| L2 cache | 1 MB | 2 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | 33.75 MB |
| Chip lithography | 130 nm | Intel 7 nm |
| Die size | 193 mm2 | no data |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 78 °C |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | no data | 78 °C |
| Number of transistors | 106 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | + |
| Unlocked multiplier | No | Yes |
Compatibility
Information on Opteron 140 EE and Xeon w5-2465X compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | 940 | FCLGA4677 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 30 Watt | 200 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Opteron 140 EE and Xeon w5-2465X. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® AMX, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512 |
| AES-NI | no data | + |
| AVX | no data | + |
| vPro | no data | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
| Speed Shift | no data | + |
| Turbo Boost Technology | no data | 2.0 |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | no data | + |
| TSX | no data | + |
| Turbo Boost Max 3.0 | no data | + |
| Status | no data | Launched |
Security technologies
Opteron 140 EE and Xeon w5-2465X technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | + |
| EDB | no data | + |
| SGX | no data | - |
| OS Guard | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Opteron 140 EE and Xeon w5-2465X are enumerated here.
| VT-d | no data | + |
| VT-x | no data | + |
| EPT | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Opteron 140 EE and Xeon w5-2465X. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR5-4800 |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 2 TB |
| Max memory channels | no data | 4 |
| ECC memory support | no data | + |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Opteron 140 EE and Xeon w5-2465X.
| PCIe version | no data | 5.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 64 |
Pros & cons summary
| Physical cores | 1 | 16 |
| Threads | 1 | 32 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 30 Watt | 200 Watt |
We couldn't decide between Opteron 140 EE and Xeon w5-2465X. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Opteron 140 EE and Xeon w5-2465X, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
