Celeron T1600 vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX and Celeron T1600 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking16not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation11.42no data
Market segmentServerLaptop
Power efficiency16.29no data
Architecture codenameStorm Peak (2023)no data
Release date19 October 2023 (1 year ago)1 October 2008 (16 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$3,899no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX and Celeron T1600 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores32 (Dotriaconta-Core)no data
Threads64no data
Base clock speed4 GHz1.66 GHz
Boost clock speed5.3 GHzno data
L1 cache64 KB (per core)no data
L2 cache1 MB (per core)no data
L3 cache128 MB (shared)1 MB L2 Cache
Chip lithography5 nm65 nm
Die size4x 71 mm2no data
Maximum core temperatureno data100 °C
Number of transistors26,280 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibilityno data-
Unlocked multiplier+-
VID voltage rangeno data1.075V-1.175V

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX and Celeron T1600 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketsTR5PPGA478
Power consumption (TDP)350 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX and Celeron T1600. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI+-
AVX+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data-
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data-
Idle Statesno data-
Demand Based Switchingno data-
Precision Boost 2+no data

Security technologies

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX and Celeron T1600 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data-
EDBno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX and Celeron T1600 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-xno data-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX and Celeron T1600. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/Ano data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX and Celeron T1600.

PCIe version5.0no data
PCI Express lanes128no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX 95712
+17271%
Celeron T1600 551

Pros & cons summary


Recency 19 October 2023 1 October 2008
Chip lithography 5 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 350 Watt 35 Watt

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX has an age advantage of 15 years, and a 1200% more advanced lithography process.

Celeron T1600, on the other hand, has 900% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX and Celeron T1600. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX is a server/workstation processor while Celeron T1600 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX and Celeron T1600, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX
Intel Celeron T1600
Celeron T1600

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.7 18 votes

Rate Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.6 7 votes

Rate Celeron T1600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX or Celeron T1600, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.