Xeon Phi 7290 vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX
Primary details
Comparing Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX and Xeon Phi 7290 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in performance ranking | 18 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Server | Server |
| Series | AMD Ryzen Threadripper | no data |
| Architecture codename | Chagall PRO (2022) | Knights Landing (2016) |
| Release date | 8 March 2022 (2 years ago) | 20 June 2016 (8 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX and Xeon Phi 7290 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 64 (Tetrahexaconta-Core) | 72 (Doheptaconta-Core) |
| Threads | 128 | 288 |
| Base clock speed | 2.7 GHz | 1.5 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 4.5 GHz | 1.7 GHz |
| Multiplier | 27 | no data |
| L1 cache | 4 MB | 32 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 32 MB | 512 KB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 256 MB | 0 KB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 7 nm | 14 nm |
| Die size | 8x 81 mm2 | no data |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 95 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | 33,200 million | 8,000 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | + | - |
Compatibility
Information on Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX and Xeon Phi 7290 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | WRX8 | 3647 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 280 Watt | 245 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX and Xeon Phi 7290. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| vPro | no data | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
Security technologies
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX and Xeon Phi 7290 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX and Xeon Phi 7290 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
| VT-d | no data | + |
| VT-x | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX and Xeon Phi 7290. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4-3200 | DDR4 |
| Maximum memory size | 2 TiB | no data |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 204.8 GB/s | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX and Xeon Phi 7290.
| PCIe version | 4.0 | no data |
| PCI Express lanes | 128 | no data |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 8 March 2022 | 20 June 2016 |
| Physical cores | 64 | 72 |
| Threads | 128 | 288 |
| Chip lithography | 7 nm | 14 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 280 Watt | 245 Watt |
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX has an age advantage of 5 years, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.
Xeon Phi 7290, on the other hand, has 12.5% more physical cores and 125% more threads, and 14.3% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX and Xeon Phi 7290. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX and Xeon Phi 7290, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
