Xeon Phi 7210 vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX
Aggregate performance score
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX outperforms Xeon Phi 7210 by a whopping 1200% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 43 | 1571 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Server | Server |
| Series | AMD Ryzen Threadripper | no data |
| Power efficiency | 8.17 | 0.82 |
| Designer | AMD | Intel |
| Manufacturer | TSMC | Intel |
| Architecture codename | Chagall PRO (2022) | Knights Landing (2016) |
| Release date | 8 March 2022 (3 years ago) | 20 June 2016 (9 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX and Xeon Phi 7210 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 64 (Tetrahexaconta-Core) | 64 (Tetrahexaconta-Core) |
| Threads | 128 | 256 |
| Base clock speed | 2.7 GHz | 1.3 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 4.5 GHz | 1.5 GHz |
| Multiplier | 27 | no data |
| L1 cache | 64K (per core) | 32 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 512K (per core) | 512 KB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 256 MB | 0 KB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 7 nm | 14 nm |
| Die size | 8x 81 mm2 | no data |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 95 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | 33,200 million | 8,000 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | + | - |
Compatibility
Information on Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX and Xeon Phi 7210 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | WRX8 | 3647 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 280 Watt | 215 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX and Xeon Phi 7210. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| vPro | no data | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
Security technologies
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX and Xeon Phi 7210 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX and Xeon Phi 7210 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
| VT-d | no data | + |
| VT-x | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX and Xeon Phi 7210. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4-3200 | DDR4 |
| Maximum memory size | 2 TiB | no data |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 204.8 GB/s | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX and Xeon Phi 7210.
| PCIe version | 4.0 | no data |
| PCI Express lanes | 128 | no data |
Synthetic benchmarks
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 54.22 | 4.17 |
| Recency | 8 March 2022 | 20 June 2016 |
| Threads | 128 | 256 |
| Chip lithography | 7 nm | 14 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 280 Watt | 215 Watt |
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX has a 1200.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.
Xeon Phi 7210, on the other hand, has 100% more threads, and 30.2% lower power consumption.
The AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Xeon Phi 7210 in performance tests.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
