Celeron J1800 vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX

VS

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX and Celeron J1800 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking18not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentServerLaptop
SeriesAMD Ryzen ThreadripperIntel Celeron
Power efficiency19.83no data
Architecture codenameChagall PRO (2022)Bay Trail-D (2013)
Release date8 March 2022 (2 years ago)1 November 2013 (11 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$72

Detailed specifications

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX and Celeron J1800 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores64 (Tetrahexaconta-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads1282
Base clock speed2.7 GHz2.41 GHz
Boost clock speed4.5 GHz2.58 GHz
Multiplier27no data
L1 cache4 MB112 KB
L2 cache32 MB1 MB
L3 cache256 MB1 MB L2 Cache
Chip lithography7 nm22 nm
Die size8x 81 mm2no data
Maximum core temperatureno data105 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)95 °Cno data
Number of transistors33,200 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+-

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX and Celeron J1800 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketWRX8FCBGA1170
Power consumption (TDP)280 Watt10 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX and Celeron J1800. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI+-
AVX+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data-
PAEno data36 Bit
FDIno data-
RSTno data-

Security technologies

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX and Celeron J1800 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

EDBno data+
Anti-Theftno data-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX and Celeron J1800 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data-
VT-xno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX and Celeron J1800. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-3200DDR3
Maximum memory size2 TiB8 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
Maximum memory bandwidth204.8 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card-Intel® HD Graphics for Intel Atom® Processor Z3700 Series
Quick Sync Video-+
Graphics max frequency-792 MHz
InTru 3D--

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX and Celeron J1800 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported-2

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX and Celeron J1800.

PCIe version4.02.0
PCI Express lanes1284

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX 93192
+16164%
Celeron J1800 573

Pros & cons summary


Recency 8 March 2022 1 November 2013
Physical cores 64 2
Threads 128 2
Chip lithography 7 nm 22 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 280 Watt 10 Watt

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX has an age advantage of 8 years, 3100% more physical cores and 6300% more threads, and a 214.3% more advanced lithography process.

Celeron J1800, on the other hand, has 2700% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX and Celeron J1800. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX is a server/workstation processor while Celeron J1800 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX and Celeron J1800, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX
Intel Celeron J1800
Celeron J1800

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 1441 vote

Rate Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.8 531 vote

Rate Celeron J1800 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX or Celeron J1800, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.