EPYC 9354 vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX

VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX
2022
64 cores / 128 threads, 280 Watt
60.89
+37.4%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX outperforms EPYC 9354 by a substantial 37% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX and EPYC 9354 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1853
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data9.57
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesAMD Ryzen ThreadripperAMD EPYC
Power efficiency19.8314.44
Architecture codenameChagall PRO (2022)Genoa (2022−2023)
Release date8 March 2022 (2 years ago)10 November 2022 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$3,420

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX and EPYC 9354 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores64 (Tetrahexaconta-Core)32 (Dotriaconta-Core)
Threads12864
Base clock speed2.7 GHz3.25 GHz
Boost clock speed4.5 GHz3.25 GHz
Multiplier2732.5
L1 cache4 MB2 MB
L2 cache32 MB32 MB
L3 cache256 MB256 MB (shared)
Chip lithography7 nm5 nm, 6 nm
Die size8x 81 mm28x 72 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)95 °Cno data
Number of transistors33,200 million52,560 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX and EPYC 9354 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration12
SocketWRX8SP5
Power consumption (TDP)280 Watt280 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX and EPYC 9354. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++
Precision Boost 2no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX and EPYC 9354 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX and EPYC 9354. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-3200DDR5-4800
Maximum memory size2 TiB6 TiB
Maximum memory bandwidth204.8 GB/s460.8 GB/s

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX and EPYC 9354.

PCIe version4.05.0
PCI Express lanes128128

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX 60.89
+37.4%
EPYC 9354 44.33

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX 93192
+37.4%
EPYC 9354 67842

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX 1962
+10.3%
EPYC 9354 1779

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX 16273
+26.3%
EPYC 9354 12881

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 60.89 44.33
Recency 8 March 2022 10 November 2022
Physical cores 64 32
Threads 128 64
Chip lithography 7 nm 5 nm

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX has a 37.4% higher aggregate performance score, and 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads.

EPYC 9354, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 8 months, and a 40% more advanced lithography process.

The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX is our recommended choice as it beats the EPYC 9354 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX and EPYC 9354, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX
AMD EPYC 9354
EPYC 9354

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 1441 vote

Rate Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 3 votes

Rate EPYC 9354 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX or EPYC 9354, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.