Celeron 857 vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX

VS

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX and Celeron 857 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking57not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentServerLaptop
SeriesAMD Ryzen ThreadripperIntel Celeron
Power efficiency14.19no data
Architecture codenameChagall PRO (2022)Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
Release date8 March 2022 (2 years ago)1 July 2011 (13 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$134

Detailed specifications

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX and Celeron 857 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores24 (Tetracosa-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads482
Base clock speed3.8 GHz1.2 GHz
Boost clock speed4.5 GHz1.2 GHz
Bus typeno dataDMI 2.0
Bus rateno data4 × 5 GT/s
Multiplier3812
L1 cache1536 KB128 KB
L2 cache12 MB512 KB
L3 cache128 MB2 MB (shared)
Chip lithography7 nm32 nm
Die size4x 81 mm2131 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)95 °Cno data
Number of transistors16,600 million504 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+-

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX and Celeron 857 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11 (Uniprocessor)
SocketWRX8FCBGA1023
Power consumption (TDP)280 Watt17 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX and Celeron 857. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2
AES-NI+-
FMA-+
AVX+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
My WiFino data-
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data-
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Flex Memory Accessno data+
Demand Based Switchingno data-
FDIno data+
Fast Memory Accessno data+

Security technologies

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX and Celeron 857 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data-
EDBno data+
Anti-Theftno data-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX and Celeron 857 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data-
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX and Celeron 857. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-3200DDR3
Maximum memory size2 TiB16 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
Maximum memory bandwidth204.8 GB/s21.335 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card-Intel® HD Graphics for 2nd Generation Intel® Processors
Clear Video HD--
Graphics max frequency-1 GHz
InTru 3D--

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX and Celeron 857 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported-2
eDP-+
DisplayPort-+
HDMI-+
SDVO-+
CRT-+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX and Celeron 857.

PCIe version4.02.0
PCI Express lanes12816

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX 66680
+11619%
Celeron 857 569

Pros & cons summary


Recency 8 March 2022 1 July 2011
Physical cores 24 2
Threads 48 2
Chip lithography 7 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 280 Watt 17 Watt

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX has an age advantage of 10 years, 1100% more physical cores and 2300% more threads, and a 357.1% more advanced lithography process.

Celeron 857, on the other hand, has 1547.1% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX and Celeron 857. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX is a server/workstation processor while Celeron 857 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX and Celeron 857, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX
Intel Celeron 857
Celeron 857

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4 29 votes

Rate Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 1 vote

Rate Celeron 857 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX or Celeron 857, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.