MediaTek Kompanio 520 vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX
Aggregate performance score
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX outperforms MediaTek Kompanio 520 by a whopping 960% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX and MediaTek Kompanio 520 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 258 | 1921 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Server | Laptop |
| Series | AMD Ryzen Threadripper | MediaTek Kompanio 500 |
| Power efficiency | 7.14 | 0.09 |
| Architecture codename | Matisse (2019−2020) | 2x Cortex-A76 / 6x A55 |
| Release date | 14 July 2020 (4 years ago) | no data (2024 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX and MediaTek Kompanio 520 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 12 (Dodeca-Core) | 8 (Octa-Core) |
| Threads | 24 | 8 |
| Base clock speed | 4 GHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 4.3 GHz | 2 GHz |
| Multiplier | 40 | no data |
| L1 cache | 64K (per core) | no data |
| L2 cache | 512K (per core) | no data |
| L3 cache | 64 MB | no data |
| Chip lithography | 7 nm, 12 nm | 7 nm |
| Die size | 74 mm2 | no data |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 95 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | 3,800 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | + | no data |
| Unlocked multiplier | + | - |
Compatibility
Information on Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX and MediaTek Kompanio 520 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | no data |
| Socket | TR4 | no data |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 280 Watt | 2000 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX and MediaTek Kompanio 520. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | - |
| AVX | + | - |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX and MediaTek Kompanio 520 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX and MediaTek Kompanio 520. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4-3200 | no data |
| Maximum memory size | 2 TiB | no data |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 204.8 GB/s | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX and MediaTek Kompanio 520.
| PCIe version | 4.0 | no data |
| PCI Express lanes | 128 | no data |
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 21.20 | 2.00 |
| Physical cores | 12 | 8 |
| Threads | 24 | 8 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 280 Watt | 2000 Watt |
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX has a 960% higher aggregate performance score, 50% more physical cores and 200% more threads, and 614.3% lower power consumption.
The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX is our recommended choice as it beats the MediaTek Kompanio 520 in performance tests.
Be aware that Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX is a server/workstation processor while MediaTek Kompanio 520 is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX and MediaTek Kompanio 520, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
