MediaTek Kompanio 520 vs Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
Aggregate performance score
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X outperforms MediaTek Kompanio 520 by a whopping 1710% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 176 | 2282 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 15.58 | no data |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Laptop |
| Series | AMD Ryzen Threadripper | MediaTek Kompanio 500 |
| Power efficiency | 4.72 | no data |
| Designer | AMD | no data |
| Manufacturer | TSMC | no data |
| Architecture codename | Matisse (2019−2020) | 2x Cortex-A76 / 6x A55 |
| Release date | 25 November 2019 (6 years ago) | no data |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $1,399 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X and MediaTek Kompanio 520 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 24 (Tetracosa-Core) | 8 (Octa-Core) |
| Threads | 48 | 8 |
| Base clock speed | 3.8 GHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 4.5 GHz | 2 GHz |
| Bus rate | 8 × 16 GT/s | no data |
| Multiplier | 38 | no data |
| L1 cache | 96K (per core) | no data |
| L2 cache | 512K (per core) | no data |
| L3 cache | 128 MB | no data |
| Chip lithography | 7 nm, 12 nm | 7 nm |
| Number of transistors | 19,200 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | + | no data |
| Unlocked multiplier | + | - |
Compatibility
Information on Ryzen Threadripper 3960X and MediaTek Kompanio 520 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 (Uniprocessor) | no data |
| Socket | TR4 | no data |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 280 Watt | W |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen Threadripper 3960X and MediaTek Kompanio 520. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | - |
| AVX | + | - |
| Precision Boost 2 | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen Threadripper 3960X and MediaTek Kompanio 520 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen Threadripper 3960X and MediaTek Kompanio 520. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4 Eight-channel | no data |
| Maximum memory size | 256 GB | no data |
| Max memory channels | 4 | no data |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 102.403 GB/s | no data |
| ECC memory support | + | - |
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 31.31 | 1.73 |
| Physical cores | 24 | 8 |
| Threads | 48 | 8 |
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X has a 1709.8% higher aggregate performance score, and 200% more physical cores and 500% more threads.
The AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X is our recommended choice as it beats the MediaTek Kompanio 520 in performance tests.
Note that Ryzen Threadripper 3960X is a desktop processor while MediaTek Kompanio 520 is a notebook one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
