i7-870S vs Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X
2020
64 cores / 128 threads, 280 Watt
50.29
+2790%
Core i7-870S
2010
4 cores / 8 threads, 82 Watt
1.74

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X outperforms Core i7-870S by a whopping 2790% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen Threadripper 3990X and Core i7-870S processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking342028
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation9.69no data
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
SeriesAMD Ryzen Threadripperno data
Power efficiency17.002.01
Architecture codenameMatisse (2019−2020)Lynnfield (2009−2010)
Release date7 February 2020 (4 years ago)19 July 2010 (14 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$3,999no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X and Core i7-870S basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores64 (Tetrahexaconta-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads1288
Base clock speed2.9 GHz2.66 GHz
Boost clock speed4.3 GHz3.6 GHz
Bus rateno data2.5 GT/s
Multiplier29no data
L1 cache96K (per core)64 KB (per core)
L2 cache512K (per core)256 KB (per core)
L3 cache256 MB8 MB (shared)
Chip lithography7 nm, 12 nm45 nm
Die size74 mm2296 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)95 °Cno data
Number of transistors3,800 million774 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+-
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen Threadripper 3990X and Core i7-870S compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketTR4FCLGA1156,LGA1156
Power consumption (TDP)280 Watt82 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen Threadripper 3990X and Core i7-870S. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.2
AES-NI+-
AVX+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data1.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
Idle Statesno data+
Demand Based Switchingno data-
PAEno data36 Bit
Precision Boost 2+no data

Security technologies

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X and Core i7-870S technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen Threadripper 3990X and Core i7-870S are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen Threadripper 3990X and Core i7-870S. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-3200DDR3
Maximum memory size256 GB16 GB
Max memory channels42
Maximum memory bandwidth102.403 GB/s21 GB/s
ECC memory support+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen Threadripper 3990X and Core i7-870S.

PCIe version4.02.0
PCI Express lanesno data16

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X 50.29
+2790%
i7-870S 1.74

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X 79889
+2789%
i7-870S 2765

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 50.29 1.74
Recency 7 February 2020 19 July 2010
Physical cores 64 4
Threads 128 8
Chip lithography 7 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 280 Watt 82 Watt

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X has a 2790.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 9 years, 1500% more physical cores and 1500% more threads, and a 542.9% more advanced lithography process.

i7-870S, on the other hand, has 241.5% lower power consumption.

The Ryzen Threadripper 3990X is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i7-870S in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen Threadripper 3990X and Core i7-870S, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3990X
Ryzen Threadripper 3990X
Intel Core i7-870S
Core i7-870S

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3 1119 votes

Rate Ryzen Threadripper 3990X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 5 votes

Rate Core i7-870S on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen Threadripper 3990X or Core i7-870S, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.