Xeon X5675 vs Ryzen Threadripper 3960X

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen Threadripper 3960X and Xeon X5675 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking	89	1322
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	25.47	2.19
Market segment	Desktop processor	Server
Series	AMD Ryzen Threadripper	no data
Architecture codename	Matisse (2019−2020)	Westmere-EP (2010−2011)
Release date	25 November 2019 (4 years ago)	14 February 2011 (13 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$1,399	$162
Current price	$1235 (0.9x MSRP)	$78 (0.5x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Ryzen Threadripper 3960X has 1063% better value for money than Xeon X5675.

Detailed specifications

Ryzen Threadripper 3960X and Xeon X5675 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores	24 (Tetracosa-Core)	6 (Hexa-Core)
Threads	48	12
Base clock speed	3.8 GHz	3.06 GHz
Boost clock speed	4.5 GHz	3.46 GHz
Bus support	8 × 16 GT/s	no data
L1 cache	96K (per core)	64 KB (per core)
L2 cache	512K (per core)	256 KB (per core)
L3 cache	128 MB	12288 KB (shared)
Chip lithography	7 nm, 12 nm	32 nm
Die size	no data	239 mm2
Maximum core temperature	no data	81 °C
Number of transistors	19,200 million	1,170 million
64 bit support	+	+
Windows 11 compatibility	+	-
Unlocked multiplier	Yes	No

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen Threadripper 3960X and Xeon X5675 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration	1 (Uniprocessor)	2
Socket	TR4	FCLGA1366,LGA1366
Power consumption (TDP)	280 Watt	95 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen Threadripper 3960X and Xeon X5675. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions	no data	Intel® SSE4.2
AES-NI	+	+
AVX	+	no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)	no data	+
Turbo Boost Technology	no data	1.0
Hyper-Threading Technology	no data	+
Idle States	no data	+
Thermal Monitoring	no data	-
Demand Based Switching	no data	+
PAE	no data	40 Bit
Status	no data	Discontinued

Security technologies

Ryzen Threadripper 3960X and Xeon X5675 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT	no data	+
EDB	no data	+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen Threadripper 3960X and Xeon X5675 are enumerated here.

AMD-V	+	no data
VT-d	no data	+
VT-x	no data	+
EPT	no data	+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen Threadripper 3960X and Xeon X5675. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory types	DDR4 Eight-channel	DDR3
Maximum memory size	256 GB	288 GB
Max memory channels	4	3
Maximum memory bandwidth	102.403 GB/s	32 GB/s
ECC memory support	+	+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen Threadripper 3960X and Xeon X5675.

PCIe version

no data

2.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.

---

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen Threadripper 3960X outperforms Xeon X5675 by 753% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

---

Pros & cons summary

---

Performance score	35.48	4.16
Recency	25 November 2019	14 February 2011
Physical cores	24	6
Threads	48	12
Cost	$1399	$162
Chip lithography	7 nm	32 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	280 Watt	95 Watt

---

Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen Threadripper 3960X and Xeon X5675, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.

---