Core i7-14700K vs Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
Aggregated performance score
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X outperforms Core i7-14700K by 2% based on our aggregated benchmark results.
General info
Comparing Ryzen Threadripper 3960X and Core i7-14700K processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in performance ranking | 89 | 92 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Value for money | 19.12 | 64.01 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Desktop processor |
| Series | AMD Ryzen Threadripper | no data |
| Architecture codename | Matisse (2019−2020) | Raptor Lake-R |
| Release date | 25 November 2019 (4 years ago) | 17 October 2023 (less than a year ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $1,399 | $319 |
| Current price | $1725 (1.2x MSRP) | $594 (1.9x MSRP) |
Value for money
Performance per price, higher is better.
i7-14700K has 235% better value for money than Ryzen Threadripper 3960X.
Technical specs
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X and Core i7-14700K basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 24 (Tetracosa-Core) | 20 (Icosa-Core) |
| Threads | 48 | 28 |
| Base clock speed | 3.8 GHz | 3.4 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 4.5 GHz | 5.6 GHz |
| Bus support | 8 × 16 GT/s | no data |
| L1 cache | 96K (per core) | 80 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 512K (per core) | 2 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 128 MB | 33 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 7 nm, 12 nm | Intel 7 nm |
| Die size | no data | 257 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 100 °C |
| Number of transistors | 19,200 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | + | + |
| Unlocked multiplier | Yes | Yes |
Compatibility
Information on Ryzen Threadripper 3960X and Core i7-14700K compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 (Uniprocessor) | 1 |
| Socket | TR4 | FCLGA1700 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 280 Watt | 125 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen Threadripper 3960X and Core i7-14700K. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2 |
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
| Speed Shift | no data | + |
| Turbo Boost Technology | no data | 2.0 |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | no data | + |
| TSX | no data | + |
| Idle States | no data | + |
| Thermal Monitoring | no data | + |
| SIPP | no data | + |
| Turbo Boost Max 3.0 | no data | + |
| Status | no data | Launched |
Security technologies
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X and Core i7-14700K technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | + |
| EDB | no data | + |
| Secure Key | no data | + |
| OS Guard | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen Threadripper 3960X and Core i7-14700K are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | no data |
| VT-d | no data | + |
| VT-x | no data | + |
| EPT | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen Threadripper 3960X and Core i7-14700K. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4 Eight-channel | DDR5, DDR4 |
| Maximum memory size | 256 GB | 192 GB |
| Max memory channels | 4 | 2 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 102.403 GB/s | 89.6 GB/s |
| ECC memory support | + | + |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | - | Intel UHD Graphics 770 |
| Quick Sync Video | - | + |
| Clear Video HD | - | + |
| Graphics max frequency | - | 1.6 GHz |
| Execution Units | - | 32 |
Graphics interfaces
Available interfaces and connections of Ryzen Threadripper 3960X and Core i7-14700K integrated GPUs.
| Number of displays supported | - | 4 |
Graphics image quality
Maximum display resolutions supported by Ryzen Threadripper 3960X and Core i7-14700K integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.
| Max resolution over HDMI 1.4 | - | 4096 x 2160 @ 60Hz |
| Max resolution over eDP | - | 5120 x 3200 @ 120Hz |
| Max resolution over DisplayPort | - | 7680 x 4320 @ 60Hz |
Graphics API support
APIs supported by Ryzen Threadripper 3960X and Core i7-14700K integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.
| DirectX | - | 12 |
| OpenGL | - | 4.5 |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen Threadripper 3960X and Core i7-14700K.
| PCIe version | no data | 5.0 and 4.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 20 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X outperforms Core i7-14700K by 2% based on our aggregated benchmark results.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Benchmark coverage: 68%
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X outperforms Core i7-14700K by 2% in Passmark.
GeekBench 5 Single-Core
GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.
Benchmark coverage: 42%
Core i7-14700K outperforms Ryzen Threadripper 3960X by 77% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.
Benchmark coverage: 42%
Core i7-14700K outperforms Ryzen Threadripper 3960X by 45% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.
Advantages and disadvantages
| Performance score | 35.18 | 34.40 |
| Recency | 25 November 2019 | 17 October 2023 |
| Physical cores | 24 | 20 |
| Threads | 48 | 28 |
| Cost | $1399 | $319 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 280 Watt | 125 Watt |
We couldn't decide between Ryzen Threadripper 3960X and Core i7-14700K. The differences in performance seem too small.
Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen Threadripper 3960X and Core i7-14700K, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
