Celeron J4025 vs Ryzen Threadripper 3960X

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
2019
24 cores / 48 threads, 280 Watt
35.48
+3635%

Ryzen Threadripper 3960X outperforms Celeron J4025 by a whopping 3635% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen Threadripper 3960X and Celeron J4025 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking892406
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation25.490.62
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
SeriesAMD Ryzen Threadripperno data
Architecture codenameMatisse (2019−2020)Gemini Lake Refresh (2019)
Release date25 November 2019 (4 years ago)4 November 2019 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,399no data
Current price$1235 (0.9x MSRP)$587

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Ryzen Threadripper 3960X has 4011% better value for money than Celeron J4025.

Detailed specifications

Ryzen Threadripper 3960X and Celeron J4025 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores24 (Tetracosa-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads482
Base clock speed3.8 GHz2 GHz
Boost clock speed4.5 GHz2.9 GHz
Bus support8 × 16 GT/sno data
L1 cache96K (per core)no data
L2 cache512K (per core)4 MB
L3 cache128 MB4 MB
Chip lithography7 nm, 12 nm14 nm
Maximum core temperatureno data105 °C
Number of transistors19,200 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++
Unlocked multiplierYesNo

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen Threadripper 3960X and Celeron J4025 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketTR4FCBGA1090
Power consumption (TDP)280 Watt10 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen Threadripper 3960X and Celeron J4025. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.2
AES-NI++
AVX+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Speed Shiftno data-
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data-
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoringno data+
Smart Responseno data-
GPIOno data+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data-
Statusno dataDiscontinued

Security technologies

Ryzen Threadripper 3960X and Celeron J4025 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

EDBno data+
Secure Keyno data+
MPXno data+
Identity Protectionno data+
SGXno dataYes with Intel® ME
OS Guardno data+
Anti-Theftno data-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen Threadripper 3960X and Celeron J4025 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+no data
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen Threadripper 3960X and Celeron J4025. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Eight-channelDDR4
Maximum memory size256 GB8 GB
Max memory channels42
Maximum memory bandwidth102.403 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card-Intel UHD Graphics 600
Max video memory-8 GB
Quick Sync Video-+
Graphics max frequency-700 MHz
Execution Units-12

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Ryzen Threadripper 3960X and Celeron J4025 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported-3
eDP-+
DisplayPort-+
HDMI-+
MIPI-DSI-+

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Ryzen Threadripper 3960X and Celeron J4025 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution support-+
Max resolution over HDMI 1.4-4096x2160@30Hz
Max resolution over eDP-4096x2160@60Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPort-4096x2160@60Hz

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Ryzen Threadripper 3960X and Celeron J4025 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX-12
OpenGL-4.4

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen Threadripper 3960X and Celeron J4025.

PCIe versionno data2.0
PCI Express lanesno data6
USB revisionno data2.0/3.0
Total number of SATA portsno data2
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Portsno data2
Number of USB portsno data8
Integrated LANno data-
UARTno data+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen Threadripper 3960X 35.48
+3635%
Celeron J4025 0.95

Ryzen Threadripper 3960X outperforms Celeron J4025 by 3635% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Ryzen Threadripper 3960X 54878
+3633%
Celeron J4025 1470

Ryzen Threadripper 3960X outperforms Celeron J4025 by 3633% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Ryzen Threadripper 3960X 1670
+387%
Celeron J4025 343

Ryzen Threadripper 3960X outperforms Celeron J4025 by 387% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Ryzen Threadripper 3960X 13289
+2294%
Celeron J4025 555

Ryzen Threadripper 3960X outperforms Celeron J4025 by 2294% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 35.48 0.95
Physical cores 24 2
Threads 48 2
Chip lithography 7 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 280 Watt 10 Watt

The Ryzen Threadripper 3960X is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron J4025 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen Threadripper 3960X and Celeron J4025, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
Intel Celeron J4025
Celeron J4025

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 114 votes

Rate Ryzen Threadripper 3960X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 98 votes

Rate Celeron J4025 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen Threadripper 3960X or Celeron J4025, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.