Athlon MP 1600+ vs Ryzen Threadripper 2900X
Primary details
Comparing Ryzen Threadripper 2900X and Athlon MP 1600+ processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in performance ranking | not rated | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Server |
| Series | no data | AMD Athlon MP |
| Architecture codename | Zen (2017−2020) | K7 (2000−2003) |
| Release date | August 2018 (5 years ago) | 15 October 2001 (22 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $210 |
| Current price | $686 | $55 (0.3x MSRP) |
Detailed specifications
Ryzen Threadripper 2900X and Athlon MP 1600+ basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 8 (Octa-Core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
| Threads | no data | 1 |
| Boost clock speed | 3.1 GHz | 1.4 GHz |
| Bus support | no data | 266 MT/s |
| L1 cache | 96 KB (per core) | 128 KB |
| L2 cache | 512 KB (per core) | 256 KB |
| L3 cache | 32768 KB | no data |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 180 nm |
| Die size | 213 mm2 | 128 mm2 |
| Number of transistors | 9600 million | 38 Million |
| 64 bit support | + | - |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
| Unlocked multiplier | Yes | No |
Compatibility
Information on Ryzen Threadripper 2900X and Athlon MP 1600+ compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 2 (Multiprocessor) |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 125 Watt | 62.8 Watt |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen Threadripper 2900X and Athlon MP 1600+ are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen Threadripper 2900X and Athlon MP 1600+. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4 | no data |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 4 GB |
Pros & cons summary
| Physical cores | 8 | 1 |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 180 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 125 Watt | 62 Watt |
We couldn't decide between Ryzen Threadripper 2900X and Athlon MP 1600+. We've got no test results to judge.
Note that Ryzen Threadripper 2900X is a desktop processor while Athlon MP 1600+ is a server/workstation one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen Threadripper 2900X and Athlon MP 1600+, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
