Xeon Gold 5416S vs Platinum 8180

VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon Platinum 8180
2017
28 cores / 56 threads, 205 Watt
24.09
+6.4%
Xeon Gold 5416S
2023
16 cores / 32 threads, 150 Watt
22.65

Xeon Platinum 8180 outperforms Xeon Gold 5416S by a small 6% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon Platinum 8180 and Xeon Gold 5416S processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking206230
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.9463.98
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesIntel Xeon Platinumno data
Power efficiency11.1214.29
Architecture codenameSkylake (server) (2017−2019)Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024)
Release date11 July 2017 (7 years ago)10 January 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$10,009$944

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon Gold 5416S has 3198% better value for money than Xeon Platinum 8180.

Detailed specifications

Xeon Platinum 8180 and Xeon Gold 5416S basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores28 (Octacosa-Core)16 (Hexadeca-Core)
Threads5632
Base clock speed2.5 GHz2 GHz
Boost clock speed3.8 GHz4 GHz
Multiplier25no data
L1 cache64K (per core)80K (per core)
L2 cache1 MB (per core)2 MB (per core)
L3 cache38.5 MB (shared)30 MB
Chip lithography14 nmIntel 7 nm
Maximum core temperature84 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data79 °C
Number of transistors8,000 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++

Compatibility

Information on Xeon Platinum 8180 and Xeon Gold 5416S compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration8 (Multiprocessor)2
SocketFCLGA3647FCLGA4677
Power consumption (TDP)205 Watt150 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon Platinum 8180 and Xeon Gold 5416S. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512Intel® AMX, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shift++
Turbo Boost Technology2.02.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSX++
Turbo Boost Max 3.0-no data
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

Xeon Platinum 8180 and Xeon Gold 5416S technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++
SGXno dataYes with Intel® SPS
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon Platinum 8180 and Xeon Gold 5416S are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon Platinum 8180 and Xeon Gold 5416S. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2666DDR5-4400
Maximum memory size768 GB4 TB
Max memory channels68
Maximum memory bandwidth128.001 GB/sno data
ECC memory support++

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon Platinum 8180 and Xeon Gold 5416S.

PCIe version3.05
PCI Express lanes4880

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon Platinum 8180 24.09
+6.4%
Xeon Gold 5416S 22.65

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon Platinum 8180 38259
+6.3%
Xeon Gold 5416S 35976

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 24.09 22.65
Recency 11 July 2017 10 January 2023
Physical cores 28 16
Threads 56 32
Power consumption (TDP) 205 Watt 150 Watt

Xeon Platinum 8180 has a 6.4% higher aggregate performance score, and 75% more physical cores and 75% more threads.

Xeon Gold 5416S, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 5 years, and 36.7% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Xeon Platinum 8180 and Xeon Gold 5416S.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon Platinum 8180 and Xeon Gold 5416S, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon Platinum 8180
Xeon Platinum 8180
Intel Xeon Gold 5416S
Xeon Gold 5416S

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 13 votes

Rate Xeon Platinum 8180 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1 1 vote

Rate Xeon Gold 5416S on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon Platinum 8180 or Xeon Gold 5416S, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.