Celeron G3900 vs Ryzen AI 9 HX 375

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen AI 9 HX 375
2024
12 cores / 24 threads, 54 Watt
22.72
+1500%

Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 outperforms Celeron G3900 by a whopping 1500% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 and Celeron G3900 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2322211
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data0.18
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesAMD Strix Point (Zen 5/5c, Ryzen AI 3/5/7/9)Intel Celeron
Power efficiency38.292.53
Architecture codenameStrix Point-HX (Zen 5) (2024)Skylake (2015−2016)
Release date25 July 2024 (less than a year ago)19 October 2015 (8 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$42

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 and Celeron G3900 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores12 (Dodeca-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads242
Base clock speed2 GHz2.8 GHz
Boost clock speed5.1 GHz2.8 GHz
Bus typeno dataDMI 3.0
Bus rateno data4 × 8 GT/s
Multiplierno data28
L1 cacheno data128 KB
L2 cache12 MB512 KB
L3 cache24 MB2 MB
Chip lithography4 nm14 nm
Die sizeno data98.57 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data65 °C
Number of transistorsno data1,400 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibilityno data-

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 and Celeron G3900 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFP8FCLGA1151
Power consumption (TDP)54 Watt51 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 and Celeron G3900. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsUSB 4, XDNA 2 NPU (55 TOPS), SMT, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512, FMA3, MMX (+), SHA, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4AIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2
AES-NI++
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data-
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+

Security technologies

Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 and Celeron G3900 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data-
EDBno data+
Secure Keyno data+
SGXno dataYes with Intel® ME
OS Guardno data-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 and Celeron G3900 are enumerated here.

VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 and Celeron G3900. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5DDR3, DDR4
Maximum memory sizeno data64 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
Maximum memory bandwidthno data34.134 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon 890MIntel HD Graphics 510
Max video memoryno data64 GB
Quick Sync Video-+
Clear Videono data+
Clear Video HDno data+
Graphics max frequencyno data950 MHz
InTru 3Dno data+

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 and Celeron G3900 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data3
eDPno data+
DisplayPort-+
HDMI-+
DVIno data+

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 and Celeron G3900 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution supportno data+
Max resolution over HDMI 1.4no data4096x2304@24Hz
Max resolution over eDPno data4096x2304@60Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPortno data4096x2304@60Hz
Max resolution over VGAno dataN/A

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 and Celeron G3900 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno data12
OpenGLno data4.4

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 and Celeron G3900.

PCIe versionno data3.0
PCI Express lanesno data16

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 22.72 1.42
Integrated graphics card 20.72 1.61
Recency 25 July 2024 19 October 2015
Physical cores 12 2
Threads 24 2
Chip lithography 4 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 54 Watt 51 Watt

Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 has a 1500% higher aggregate performance score, 1187% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 8 years, 500% more physical cores and 1100% more threads, and a 250% more advanced lithography process.

Celeron G3900, on the other hand, has 5.9% lower power consumption.

The Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron G3900 in performance tests.

Be aware that Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 is a notebook processor while Celeron G3900 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 and Celeron G3900, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 375
Ryzen AI 9 HX 375
Intel Celeron G3900
Celeron G3900

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 220 votes

Rate Celeron G3900 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 or Celeron G3900, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.