EPYC 9384X vs Ryzen AI 7 350
Aggregate performance score
EPYC 9384X outperforms Ryzen AI 7 350 by a whopping 216% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Ryzen AI 7 350 and EPYC 9384X processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 592 | 61 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | no data | 5.09 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Server |
| Power efficiency | 44.75 | 12.37 |
| Architecture codename | Krackan Point (2025) | Genoa-X (2023) |
| Release date | 6 January 2025 (less than a year ago) | 13 June 2023 (1 year ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $5,529 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
Ryzen AI 7 350 and EPYC 9384X basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 8 (Octa-Core) | 32 (Dotriaconta-Core) |
| Threads | 16 | 64 |
| Base clock speed | 2 GHz | 3.1 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 5 GHz | 3.9 GHz |
| L1 cache | 80 KB (per core) | 64 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 1 MB (per core) | 1 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 8 MB | 768 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 4 nm | 5 nm |
| Die size | no data | 8x 72 mm2 |
| Number of transistors | no data | 90,160 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
Compatibility
Information on Ryzen AI 7 350 and EPYC 9384X compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 2 |
| Socket | FP8 | SP5 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 28 Watt | 320 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen AI 7 350 and EPYC 9384X. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| Precision Boost 2 | + | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen AI 7 350 and EPYC 9384X are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen AI 7 350 and EPYC 9384X. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR5, LPDDR5X | DDR5 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | Radeon 860M | N/A |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen AI 7 350 and EPYC 9384X.
| PCIe version | 4.0 | 5.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 16 | 128 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 13.19 | 41.68 |
| Recency | 6 January 2025 | 13 June 2023 |
| Physical cores | 8 | 32 |
| Threads | 16 | 64 |
| Chip lithography | 4 nm | 5 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 28 Watt | 320 Watt |
Ryzen AI 7 350 has an age advantage of 1 year, a 25% more advanced lithography process, and 1042.9% lower power consumption.
EPYC 9384X, on the other hand, has a 216% higher aggregate performance score, and 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads.
The EPYC 9384X is our recommended choice as it beats the Ryzen AI 7 350 in performance tests.
Be aware that Ryzen AI 7 350 is a notebook processor while EPYC 9384X is a server/workstation one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
