Atom x7405C vs Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS
Primary details
Comparing Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS and Atom x7405C processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 293 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Server | Laptop |
| Power efficiency | 40.67 | no data |
| Architecture codename | Hawk Point-HS (Zen 4) (2023−2024) | Amston Lake (2024) |
| Release date | 16 April 2024 (less than a year ago) | 8 April 2024 (less than a year ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $57 |
Detailed specifications
Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS and Atom x7405C basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 8 (Octa-Core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
| Threads | 16 | 4 |
| Base clock speed | 4 GHz | 1.7 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 5.2 GHz | 3.4 GHz |
| L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | 96 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 1 MB (per core) | 2 MB (shared) |
| L3 cache | 16 MB (shared) | 6 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 4 nm | 10 nm |
| Die size | 178 mm2 | no data |
| Maximum core temperature | 100 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | 25,000 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
Compatibility
Information on Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS and Atom x7405C compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | FP7 | Intel BGA 1264 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 45 Watt | 12 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS and Atom x7405C. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | Ryzen AI, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, AVX-512, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME | no data |
| AES-NI | + | + |
| FMA | + | - |
| AVX | + | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
| Precision Boost 2 | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS and Atom x7405C are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
| VT-d | no data | + |
| VT-x | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS and Atom x7405C. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR5 | DDR4, DDR5 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | AMD Radeon 780M | N/A |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS and Atom x7405C.
| PCIe version | 4.0 | 3.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 20 | 9 |
Pros & cons summary
| Physical cores | 8 | 4 |
| Threads | 16 | 4 |
| Chip lithography | 4 nm | 10 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 45 Watt | 12 Watt |
Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS has 100% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and a 150% more advanced lithography process.
Atom x7405C, on the other hand, has 275% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS and Atom x7405C. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS is a server/workstation processor while Atom x7405C is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS and Atom x7405C, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
