Apple M3 Pro 11-Core vs Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS
2023
8 cores / 16 threads, 35 Watt
18.42
+13.8%
Apple M3 Pro 11-Core
2023
11 cores / 11 threads, 27 Watt
16.18

Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS outperforms Apple M3 Pro 11-Core by a moderate 14% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS and Apple M3 Pro 11-Core processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking342436
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD Phoenix (Zen 4, Ryzen 7040)Apple M3
Power efficiency47.9954.64
Architecture codenamePhoenix-HS (Zen 4) (2023)no data
Release date13 June 2023 (1 year ago)30 October 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS and Apple M3 Pro 11-Core basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)11 (Undeca-Core)
Threads1611
Base clock speed4 GHz2.748 GHz
Boost clock speed5.2 GHz4.06 GHz
L1 cache512 KBno data
L2 cache8 MBno data
L3 cache16 MBno data
Chip lithography4 nm3 nm
Die size178 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data37000 Million
64 bit support++

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS and Apple M3 Pro 11-Core compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

SocketFP7/FP8no data
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt27 Watt

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon 780MApple M3 Pro 14-Core GPU

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS 18.42
+13.8%
Apple M3 Pro 11-Core 16.18

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS 28187
+13.9%
Apple M3 Pro 11-Core 24757

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS 2360
+23.4%
Apple M3 Pro 11-Core 1913

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS 275
Apple M3 Pro 11-Core 281
+2.2%

Geekbench 5.5 Multi-Core

Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS 9959
Apple M3 Pro 11-Core 13312
+33.7%

Geekbench 5.5 Single-Core

Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS 1956
Apple M3 Pro 11-Core 2331
+19.2%

WebXPRT 3

Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS 296
Apple M3 Pro 11-Core 431
+45.6%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 18.42 16.18
Recency 13 June 2023 30 October 2023
Physical cores 8 11
Threads 16 11
Chip lithography 4 nm 3 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 27 Watt

Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS has a 13.8% higher aggregate performance score, and 45.5% more threads.

Apple M3 Pro 11-Core, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 4 months, 37.5% more physical cores, a 33.3% more advanced lithography process, and 29.6% lower power consumption.

The Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS is our recommended choice as it beats the Apple M3 Pro 11-Core in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS and Apple M3 Pro 11-Core, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS
Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS
Apple M3 Pro 11-Core
M3 Pro 11-Core

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4 45 votes

Rate Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 90 votes

Rate Apple M3 Pro 11-Core on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS or Apple M3 Pro 11-Core, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.