EPYC 9274F vs Ryzen 9 7950X

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 9 7950X
2022
16 cores / 32 threads, 170 Watt
40.64
EPYC 9274F
2022
24 cores / 48 threads, 320 Watt
47.50
+16.9%

EPYC 9274F outperforms Ryzen 9 7950X by a moderate 17% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 9 7950X and EPYC 9274F processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking5834
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation55.5815.09
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
Seriesno dataAMD EPYC
Architecture codenameRaphael (Zen 4)Genoa
Release date27 September 2022 (1 year ago)10 November 2022 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$3,060
Current price$821 $2995 (1x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Ryzen 9 7950X has 268% better value for money than EPYC 9274F.

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 9 7950X and EPYC 9274F basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores16 (Hexadeca-Core)24 (Tetracosa-Core)
Threads3248
Base clock speed4.5 GHz4.05 GHz
Boost clock speed5.7 GHz4.3 GHz
L1 cache64K (per core)64K (per core)
L2 cache1 MB (per core)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache64 MB (shared)256 MB (shared)
Chip lithography5 nm5 nm, 6 nm
Die sizeCCD = 2x 70 sq. mm, I/O = 122 mm28x 72 mm2
Maximum core temperature95 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)47 °Cno data
Number of transistors13140 Million52,560 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data
Unlocked multiplierYesNo

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 9 7950X and EPYC 9274F compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration12
SocketAM5SP5
Power consumption (TDP)170 Watt320 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 9 7950X and EPYC 9274F. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsCCD = 5 nm, I/O = 6 nm, 0.650 - 1.475 Vno data
AES-NI++
AVX++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 9 7950X and EPYC 9274F are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 9 7950X and EPYC 9274F. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5-5200DDR5-4800
Maximum memory sizeno data6 TiB
Maximum memory bandwidthno data460.8 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000)no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 9 7950X and EPYC 9274F.

PCIe version5.05.0
PCI Express lanes24128

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen 9 7950X 40.64
EPYC 9274F 47.50
+16.9%

EPYC 9274F outperforms Ryzen 9 7950X by 17% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Ryzen 9 7950X 62861
EPYC 9274F 73463
+16.9%

EPYC 9274F outperforms Ryzen 9 7950X by 17% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 40.64 47.50
Recency 27 September 2022 10 November 2022
Physical cores 16 24
Threads 32 48
Power consumption (TDP) 170 Watt 320 Watt

The EPYC 9274F is our recommended choice as it beats the Ryzen 9 7950X in performance tests.

Note that Ryzen 9 7950X is a desktop processor while EPYC 9274F is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 9 7950X and EPYC 9274F, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 9 7950X
Ryzen 9 7950X
AMD EPYC 9274F
EPYC 9274F

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 1372 votes

Rate Ryzen 9 7950X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 6 votes

Rate EPYC 9274F on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 9 7950X or EPYC 9274F, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.