Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS vs Ryzen 9 7940HS

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 9 7940HS
2023
8 cores / 16 threads, 35 Watt
19.69
+33.7%
Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS
2023
6 cores / 12 threads, 54 Watt
14.73

Ryzen 9 7940HS outperforms Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS by a substantial 34% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 9 7940HS and Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking263452
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Seriesno dataAMD Phoenix (Zen 4, Ryzen 7040)
Architecture codenamePhoenix-HS (Zen 4)Phoenix (Zen4)
Release dateJanuary 2023 (1 year ago)5 January 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 9 7940HS and Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)6 (Hexa-Core)
Threads1612
Base clock speed4 GHz4.3 GHz
Boost clock speed5.2 GHz5 GHz
L1 cache64K (per core)384 KB
L2 cache1 MB (per core)6 MB
L3 cache16 MB (shared)16 MB
Chip lithography4 nm4 nm
Die size178 mm2178 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °C100 °C
Number of transistors25,000 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 9 7940HS and Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketFP8no data
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt54 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 9 7940HS and Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsDDR5-5600/LPDDR5x-7500 RAM (incl. ECC), PCIe 4, Ryzen AI, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, AVX-512, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SMEno data
AES-NI+no data
FMA+no data
AVX+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 9 7940HS and Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS are enumerated here.

AMD-V+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 9 7940HS and Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon 780MAMD Radeon 760M

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 9 7940HS and Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS.

PCIe version4.0no data
PCI Express lanes20no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen 9 7940HS 19.69
+33.7%
Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS 14.73

Ryzen 9 7940HS outperforms Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS by 34% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Ryzen 9 7940HS 30456
+33.7%
Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS 22778

Ryzen 9 7940HS outperforms Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS by 34% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Ryzen 9 7940HS 2467
+8%
Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS 2285

Ryzen 9 7940HS outperforms Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS by 8% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Ryzen 9 7940HS 11544
+22.9%
Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS 9393

Ryzen 9 7940HS outperforms Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS by 23% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Benchmark coverage: 20%

Ryzen 9 7940HS 7881
+14.4%
Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS 6888

Ryzen 9 7940HS outperforms Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS by 14% in Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

Ryzen 9 7940HS 48914
+24.1%
Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS 39399

Ryzen 9 7940HS outperforms Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS by 24% in Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core.

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

Ryzen 9 7940HS 15689
+21.2%
Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS 12948

Ryzen 9 7940HS outperforms Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS by 21% in 3DMark06 CPU.

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

Ryzen 9 7940HS 30
+40.4%
Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS 22

Ryzen 9 7940HS outperforms Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS by 40% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core.

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

Benchmark coverage: 15%

Ryzen 9 7940HS 2663
+42.9%
Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS 1863

Ryzen 9 7940HS outperforms Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS by 43% in Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core.

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

Benchmark coverage: 15%

Ryzen 9 7940HS 284
+14.1%
Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS 249

Ryzen 9 7940HS outperforms Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS by 14% in Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core.

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R11.5 is an old benchmark by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version loads a single thread with ray tracing to render a glossy room full of crystal spheres and light sources.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

Ryzen 9 7940HS 3.4
+14.5%
Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS 2.97

Ryzen 9 7940HS outperforms Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS by 14% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core.

TrueCrypt AES

TrueCrypt is a discontinued piece of software that was widely used for on-the-fly-encryption of disk partitions, now superseded by VeraCrypt. It contains several embedded performance tests, one of them being TrueCrypt AES, which measures data encryption speed using AES algorithm. Result is encryption speed in gigabytes per second.

Benchmark coverage: 13%

Ryzen 9 7940HS 15
+43.8%
Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS 10.4

Ryzen 9 7940HS outperforms Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS by 44% in TrueCrypt AES.

WinRAR 4.0

WinRAR 4.0 is an outdated version of a popular file archiver. It contains an internal speed test, using 'Best' setting of RAR compression on large chunks of randomly generated data. Its results are measured in kilobytes per second.

Benchmark coverage: 13%

Ryzen 9 7940HS 7465
+11.1%
Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS 6717

Ryzen 9 7940HS outperforms Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS by 11% in WinRAR 4.0.

x264 encoding pass 2

x264 Pass 2 is a slower variant of x264 video compression that produces a variable bit rate output file, which results in better quality since the higher bit rate is used when it is needed more. Benchmark result is still measured in frames per second.  

Benchmark coverage: 13%

Ryzen 9 7940HS 146
+33.2%
Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS 110

Ryzen 9 7940HS outperforms Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS by 33% in x264 encoding pass 2.

x264 encoding pass 1

x264 version 4.0 is a video encoding benchmark uses MPEG 4 x264 compression method to compress a sample HD (720p) video. Pass 1 is a faster variant that produces a constant bit rate output file. Its result is measured in frames per second, which means how many frames of the source video file were encoded per second.  

Benchmark coverage: 13%

Ryzen 9 7940HS 299
+13.1%
Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS 264

Ryzen 9 7940HS outperforms Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS by 13% in x264 encoding pass 1.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 19.69 14.73
Integrated graphics card 18.35 15.30
Physical cores 8 6
Threads 16 12
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 54 Watt

The Ryzen 9 7940HS is our recommended choice as it beats the Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 9 7940HS and Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
Ryzen 9 7940HS
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS
Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4 847 votes

Rate Ryzen 9 7940HS on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 12 votes

Rate Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 9 7940HS or Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.