EPYC 4484PX vs Ryzen 9 3900X

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 9 3900X
2019
12 cores / 24 threads, 105 Watt
21.31
EPYC 4484PX
2024
12 cores / 24 threads, 120 Watt
33.40
+56.7%

EPYC 4484PX outperforms Ryzen 9 3900X by an impressive 57% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 9 3900X and EPYC 4484PX processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking267124
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation21.7550.12
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
SeriesAMD Ryzen 9no data
Power efficiency18.5125.38
Architecture codenameMatisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020)Raphael (2023−2024)
Release date7 July 2019 (5 years ago)21 May 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$499$599

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

EPYC 4484PX has 130% better value for money than Ryzen 9 3900X.

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 9 3900X and EPYC 4484PX basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores12 (Dodeca-Core)12 (Dodeca-Core)
Threads2424
Base clock speed3.8 GHz4.4 GHz
Boost clock speed4.6 GHz5.6 GHz
L1 cache768 KB64 KB (per core)
L2 cache6 MB1 MB (per core)
L3 cache64 MB128 MB (shared)
Chip lithography7 nm, 12 nm5 nm
Die sizeno data2x 71 mm2
Maximum core temperature95 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data47 °C
Number of transistors19,200 million17,840 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 9 3900X and EPYC 4484PX compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketAM4AM5
Power consumption (TDP)105 Watt120 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 9 3900X and EPYC 4484PX. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++
Precision Boost 2++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 9 3900X and EPYC 4484PX are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 9 3900X and EPYC 4484PX. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Dual-channelDDR5
Maximum memory size128 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth51.196 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card-AMD Radeon Graphics

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 9 3900X and EPYC 4484PX.

PCIe versionno data5.0
PCI Express lanesno data28

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen 9 3900X 21.31
EPYC 4484PX 33.40
+56.7%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ryzen 9 3900X 32620
EPYC 4484PX 51115
+56.7%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 21.31 33.40
Recency 7 July 2019 21 May 2024
Chip lithography 7 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 105 Watt 120 Watt

Ryzen 9 3900X has 14.3% lower power consumption.

EPYC 4484PX, on the other hand, has a 56.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, and a 40% more advanced lithography process.

The EPYC 4484PX is our recommended choice as it beats the Ryzen 9 3900X in performance tests.

Note that Ryzen 9 3900X is a desktop processor while EPYC 4484PX is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 9 3900X and EPYC 4484PX, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 9 3900X
Ryzen 9 3900X
AMD EPYC 4484PX
EPYC 4484PX

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.7 5122 votes

Rate Ryzen 9 3900X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1 1 vote

Rate EPYC 4484PX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 9 3900X or EPYC 4484PX, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.