EPYC 9655P vs Ryzen 9 3900X

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 9 3900X
2019
12 cores / 24 threads, 105 Watt
20.61
EPYC 9655P
2024
96 cores / 192 threads, 400 Watt
100.00
+385%

EPYC 9655P outperforms Ryzen 9 3900X by a whopping 385% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 9 3900X and EPYC 9655P processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2691
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation20.472.47
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
SeriesAMD Ryzen 9no data
Power efficiency18.5023.56
Architecture codenameMatisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020)Turin (2024)
Release date7 July 2019 (5 years ago)10 October 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$499$10,811

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Ryzen 9 3900X has 729% better value for money than EPYC 9655P.

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 9 3900X and EPYC 9655P basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores12 (Dodeca-Core)96
Threads24192
Base clock speed3.8 GHz2.6 GHz
Boost clock speed4.6 GHz4.5 GHz
L1 cache768 KB80 KB (per core)
L2 cache6 MB1 MB (per core)
L3 cache64 MB384 MB (shared)
Chip lithography7 nm, 12 nm4 nm
Die sizeno data12x 70.6 mm2
Maximum core temperature95 °Cno data
Number of transistors19,200 million99,780 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 9 3900X and EPYC 9655P compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketAM4SP5
Power consumption (TDP)105 Watt400 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 9 3900X and EPYC 9655P. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++
Precision Boost 2++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 9 3900X and EPYC 9655P are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 9 3900X and EPYC 9655P. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Dual-channelDDR5
Maximum memory size128 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth51.196 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card-N/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 9 3900X and EPYC 9655P.

PCIe versionno data5.0
PCI Express lanesno data128

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen 9 3900X 20.61
EPYC 9655P 100.00
+385%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ryzen 9 3900X 32619
EPYC 9655P 158260
+385%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 20.61 100.00
Recency 7 July 2019 10 October 2024
Physical cores 12 96
Threads 24 192
Chip lithography 7 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 105 Watt 400 Watt

Ryzen 9 3900X has 281% lower power consumption.

EPYC 9655P, on the other hand, has a 385.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, 700% more physical cores and 700% more threads, and a 75% more advanced lithography process.

The EPYC 9655P is our recommended choice as it beats the Ryzen 9 3900X in performance tests.

Note that Ryzen 9 3900X is a desktop processor while EPYC 9655P is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 9 3900X and EPYC 9655P, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 9 3900X
Ryzen 9 3900X
AMD EPYC 9655P
EPYC 9655P

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.7 5136 votes

Rate Ryzen 9 3900X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 47 votes

Rate EPYC 9655P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 9 3900X or EPYC 9655P, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.