Celeron M U3600 vs Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 510 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | AMD Phoenix (Zen 4, Ryzen 7040) | Intel Celeron M |
| Power efficiency | 18.49 | no data |
| Designer | AMD | Intel |
| Architecture codename | Phoenix-HS (Zen 4) (2023) | Arrandale (2010−2011) |
| Release date | 13 June 2023 (2 years ago) | 18 December 2010 (14 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS and Celeron M U3600 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 8 (Octa-Core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Threads | 16 | 2 |
| Base clock speed | 3.8 GHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 5.1 GHz | 1.2 GHz |
| Bus rate | no data | 2500 MHz |
| L1 cache | 512 KB | no data |
| L2 cache | 8 MB | 512 KB |
| L3 cache | 16 MB | 2 MB |
| Chip lithography | 4 nm | 32 nm |
| Die size | 178 mm2 | 81+114 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 100 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | no data | 382+177 Million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | no data | - |
Compatibility
Information on Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS and Celeron M U3600 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Socket | FP7/FP8 | BGA1288 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 18 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS and Celeron M U3600. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
| Idle States | no data | + |
| Thermal Monitoring | - | + |
| Flex Memory Access | no data | + |
| Fast Memory Access | no data | + |
Security technologies
Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS and Celeron M U3600 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| EDB | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS and Celeron M U3600 are enumerated here.
| VT-x | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS and Celeron M U3600. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR3 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | AMD Radeon 780M ( - 2700 MHz) | no data |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 13 June 2023 | 18 December 2010 |
| Physical cores | 8 | 2 |
| Threads | 16 | 2 |
| Chip lithography | 4 nm | 32 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 18 Watt |
Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS has an age advantage of 12 years, 300% more physical cores and 700% more threads, and a 700% more advanced lithography process.
Celeron M U3600, on the other hand, has 94.4% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS and Intel Celeron M U3600. We've got no test results to judge.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
