Processor N200 vs Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS

VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS
2023
8 cores / 16 threads, 35 Watt
16.83
+979%
Processor N200
2023
4 cores / 4 threads, 6 Watt
1.56

Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS outperforms Processor N200 by a whopping 979% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS and Processor N200 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking3922122
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD Phoenix (Zen 4, Ryzen 7040)Intel Alder Lake-N
Power efficiency45.5124.61
Architecture codenamePhoenix-HS (Zen 4) (2023)Alder Lake-N (2023)
Release date13 June 2023 (1 year ago)3 January 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$193

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS and Processor N200 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads164
Base clock speed3.8 GHz0.1 GHz
Boost clock speed5.1 GHz3.7 GHz
L1 cache512 KB96 KB (per core)
L2 cache8 MB2 MB (shared)
L3 cache16 MB6 MB (shared)
Chip lithography4 nm10 nm
Die size178 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature100 °C105 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibilityno data+

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS and Processor N200 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketFP7/FP8Intel BGA 1264
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt6 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS and Processor N200. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+

Security technologies

Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS and Processor N200 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS and Processor N200 are enumerated here.

VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS and Processor N200. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR4, DDR5 4800 MHz Single-channel

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon 780M ( - 2700 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) (450 - 750 MHz)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS and Processor N200.

PCIe versionno data3.0
PCI Express lanesno data9

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS 16.83
+979%
Processor N200 1.56

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS 14772
+279%
Processor N200 3902

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS 2440
+1014%
Processor N200 219

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS 269
+138%
Processor N200 113

Geekbench 5.5 Multi-Core

Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS 11037
+617%
Processor N200 1540

Blender(-)

Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS 203
Processor N200 2150
+959%

Geekbench 5.5 Single-Core

Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS 1888
+103%
Processor N200 928

7-Zip Single

Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS 6496
+101%
Processor N200 3230

7-Zip

Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS 66442
+830%
Processor N200 7146

WebXPRT 3

Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS 363
+112%
Processor N200 171

CrossMark Overall

Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS 1620
+164%
Processor N200 614

Blender v3.3 Classroom CPU(-)

Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS 327
Processor N200 4297
+1214%

Geekbench 6.3 Multi-Core

Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS 12457
+650%
Processor N200 1660

Geekbench 6.3 Single-Core

Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS 2581
+170%
Processor N200 956

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 16.83 1.56
Integrated graphics card 18.32 3.29
Recency 13 June 2023 3 January 2023
Physical cores 8 4
Threads 16 4
Chip lithography 4 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 6 Watt

Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS has a 978.8% higher aggregate performance score, 456.8% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 5 months, 100% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and a 150% more advanced lithography process.

Processor N200, on the other hand, has 483.3% lower power consumption.

The Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS is our recommended choice as it beats the Processor N200 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS and Processor N200, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS
Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS
Intel Processor N200
Processor N200

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.6 58 votes

Rate Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 148 votes

Rate Processor N200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS or Processor N200, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.