Celeron M U3600 vs M 353
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | Celeron M | Intel Celeron M |
| Designer | Intel | Intel |
| Architecture codename | Dothan (2004−2005) | Arrandale (2010−2011) |
| Release date | no data | 18 December 2010 (15 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Celeron M 353 and Celeron M U3600 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Threads | 1 | 2 |
| Boost clock speed | 0.9 GHz | 1.2 GHz |
| Bus rate | 400 MHz | 2500 MHz |
| L2 cache | no data | 512 KB |
| L3 cache | no data | 2 MB |
| Chip lithography | 90 nm | 32 nm |
| Die size | no data | 81+114 mm2 |
| Number of transistors | no data | 382+177 Million |
| 64 bit support | - | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Celeron M 353 and Celeron M U3600 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Socket | no data | BGA1288 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 5 Watt | 18 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron M 353 and Celeron M U3600. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
| Idle States | no data | + |
| Thermal Monitoring | - | + |
| Flex Memory Access | no data | + |
| Fast Memory Access | no data | + |
Security technologies
Celeron M 353 and Celeron M U3600 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| EDB | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron M 353 and Celeron M U3600 are enumerated here.
| VT-x | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron M 353 and Celeron M U3600. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR3 |
Pros & cons summary
| Physical cores | 1 | 2 |
| Threads | 1 | 2 |
| Chip lithography | 90 nm | 32 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 5 Watt | 18 Watt |
Celeron M 353 has 260% lower power consumption.
Celeron M U3600, on the other hand, has 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and a 181.3% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Intel Celeron M 353 and Intel Celeron M U3600. We've got no test results to judge.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
