Atom C3955 vs Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS
2023
8 cores / 16 threads, 35 Watt
17.09
+359%
Atom C3955
2017
16 cores / 16 threads, 32 Watt
3.72

Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS outperforms Atom C3955 by a whopping 359% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS and Atom C3955 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking3861487
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data0.95
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesAMD Phoenix (Zen 4, Ryzen 7040)Intel Atom
Power efficiency45.3510.80
Architecture codenamePhoenix-HS (Zen 4) (2023)Goldmont (2016−2017)
Release date13 June 2023 (1 year ago)15 August 2017 (7 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$434

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS and Atom C3955 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)16 (Hexadeca-Core)
Threads1616
Base clock speed3.8 GHz2.1 GHz
Boost clock speed5.1 GHz2.4 GHz
Multiplierno data21
L1 cache512 KB896 KB
L2 cache8 MB16 MB
L3 cache16 MB16 MB
Chip lithography4 nm14 nm
Die size178 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature100 °C78 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibilityno data-

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS and Atom C3955 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFP7/FP8FCBGA1310
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt32 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS and Atom C3955. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
QuickAssistno data-
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data-

Security technologies

Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS and Atom C3955 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

EDBno data+
Secure Bootno data+
Secure Keyno data+
SGXno data-
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS and Atom C3955 are enumerated here.

VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS and Atom C3955. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR4: 2400
Maximum memory sizeno data256 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
Maximum memory bandwidthno data38.397 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon 780Mno data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS and Atom C3955.

PCIe versionno data3
PCI Express lanesno data16
USB revisionno data3
Total number of SATA portsno data16
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Portsno data16
Number of USB portsno data8
Integrated LANno data4x10/2.5/1 GBE

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS 17.09
+359%
Atom C3955 3.72

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS 26647
+359%
Atom C3955 5803

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 17.09 3.72
Recency 13 June 2023 15 August 2017
Physical cores 8 16
Chip lithography 4 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 32 Watt

Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS has a 359.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, and a 250% more advanced lithography process.

Atom C3955, on the other hand, has 100% more physical cores, and 9.4% lower power consumption.

The Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS is our recommended choice as it beats the Atom C3955 in performance tests.

Be aware that Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS is a notebook processor while Atom C3955 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS and Atom C3955, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS
Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS
Intel Atom C3955
Atom C3955

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.6 58 votes

Rate Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Atom C3955 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS or Atom C3955, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.