i5-1034G1 vs Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U
Aggregate performance score
Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U outperforms Core i5-1034G1 by an impressive 78% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U and Core i5-1034G1 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in the ranking | 770 | 1143 |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
Series | AMD Cezanne (Zen 3, Ryzen 5000) | Intel Core i5 |
Power efficiency | 63.89 | 35.92 |
Architecture codename | Cezanne U (Zen 3) (2021−2022) | Ice Lake U (2019−2020) |
Release date | 19 April 2022 (2 years ago) | 29 May 2019 (5 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U and Core i5-1034G1 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 8 (Octa-Core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
Threads | 16 | 8 |
Base clock speed | 2 GHz | 0.8 GHz |
Boost clock speed | 4.5 GHz | 3.6 GHz |
L1 cache | 64K (per core) | 192 KB |
L2 cache | 512K (per core) | 2 MB |
L3 cache | 16 MB (shared) | 6 MB |
Chip lithography | 7 nm | 10 nm |
Die size | 180 mm2 | no data |
Maximum core temperature | 105 °C | no data |
Number of transistors | 10,700 million | no data |
64 bit support | + | + |
Windows 11 compatibility | + | - |
Compatibility
Information on Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U and Core i5-1034G1 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | no data |
Socket | FP6 | no data |
Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 15 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U and Core i5-1034G1. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
Instruction set extensions | XFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMT | no data |
AES-NI | + | - |
AVX | + | - |
Turbo Boost Technology | no data | + |
Precision Boost 2 | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U and Core i5-1034G1 are enumerated here.
AMD-V | + | - |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U and Core i5-1034G1. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | DDR4-3200 | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
Integrated graphics card Compare | AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) ( - 2000 MHz) | Intel UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) (300 MHz) |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U and Core i5-1034G1.
PCIe version | 3.0 | no data |
PCI Express lanes | 8 | no data |
Pros & cons summary
Performance score | 10.12 | 5.69 |
Integrated graphics card | 9.05 | 3.14 |
Recency | 19 April 2022 | 29 May 2019 |
Physical cores | 8 | 4 |
Threads | 16 | 8 |
Chip lithography | 7 nm | 10 nm |
Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U has a 77.9% higher aggregate performance score, 188.2% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 2 years, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and a 42.9% more advanced lithography process.
The Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i5-1034G1 in performance tests.
Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U and Core i5-1034G1, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.