Ryzen 9 5900HS vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U

VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U
2020
8 cores / 16 threads, 15 Watt
9.53
Ryzen 9 5900HS
2021
8 cores / 16 threads, 35 Watt
13.60
+42.7%

Ryzen 9 5900HS outperforms Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U by a considerable 43% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U and Ryzen 9 5900HS processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking801553
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesRenoir (Ryzen 4000 APU)AMD Cezanne (Zen 3, Ryzen 5000)
Power efficiency60.1636.80
Architecture codenameRenoir-U PRO (Zen 2) (2020)Cezanne-HS (Zen 3) (2021)
Release date7 May 2020 (4 years ago)12 January 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U and Ryzen 9 5900HS basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads1616
Base clock speed1.7 GHz3 GHz
Boost clock speed4.1 GHz4.6 GHz
Bus typePCIe 3.0no data
Multiplier1730
L1 cache512 KB64 KB (per core)
L2 cache4 MB512 KB (per core)
L3 cache8 MB16 MB (shared)
Chip lithography7 nm7 nm
Die size156 mm2180 mm2
Maximum core temperature105 °Cno data
Number of transistors9800 Million10,700 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U and Ryzen 9 5900HS compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketFP6FP6
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U and Ryzen 9 5900HS. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsPRO, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SMEMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME
AES-NI++
FMA++
AVX++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U and Ryzen 9 5900HS are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U and Ryzen 9 5900HS. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR4
Maximum memory size64 GBno data
Maximum memory bandwidth68.27 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon RX Vega 7 ( - 1600 MHz)AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) ( - 2100 MHz)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U and Ryzen 9 5900HS.

PCIe versionno data3.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U 9.53
Ryzen 9 5900HS 13.60
+42.7%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U 15143
Ryzen 9 5900HS 21607
+42.7%

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U 8379
+31.3%
Ryzen 9 5900HS 6380

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U 29574
Ryzen 9 5900HS 41235
+39.4%

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U 16
Ryzen 9 5900HS 25
+58%

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U 1410
Ryzen 9 5900HS 2041
+44.8%

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U 181
Ryzen 9 5900HS 237
+30.7%

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R11.5 is an old benchmark by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version loads a single thread with ray tracing to render a glossy room full of crystal spheres and light sources.

Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U 2.12
Ryzen 9 5900HS 2.83
+33.5%

Geekbench 5.5 Multi-Core

Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U 6153
Ryzen 9 5900HS 7867
+27.9%

Blender(-)

Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U 352
+46.1%
Ryzen 9 5900HS 241

Geekbench 5.5 Single-Core

Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U 1149
Ryzen 9 5900HS 1497
+30.3%

7-Zip Single

Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U 4438
Ryzen 9 5900HS 5653
+27.4%

7-Zip

Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U 39649
Ryzen 9 5900HS 57286
+44.5%

WebXPRT 3

Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U 205
Ryzen 9 5900HS 276
+34.4%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 9.53 13.60
Integrated graphics card 7.47 9.05
Recency 7 May 2020 12 January 2021
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 35 Watt

Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U has 133.3% lower power consumption.

Ryzen 9 5900HS, on the other hand, has a 42.7% higher aggregate performance score, 21.2% faster integrated GPU, and an age advantage of 8 months.

The Ryzen 9 5900HS is our recommended choice as it beats the Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U and Ryzen 9 5900HS, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U
Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HS
Ryzen 9 5900HS

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 193 votes

Rate Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.6 177 votes

Rate Ryzen 9 5900HS on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U or Ryzen 9 5900HS, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.